PMIScore: An Unsupervised Approach to Quantify Dialogue Engagement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
High dialogue engagement is a crucial indicator of an effective conversation. A reliable measure of engagement could help benchmark large language models, enhance the effectiveness of human-computer interactions, or improve personal communication skills. However, quantifying engagement is challenging, since it is subjective and lacks a "gold standard". This paper proposes PMIScore, an efficient unsupervised approach to quantify dialogue engagement. It uses pointwise mutual information (PMI), which is the probability of generating a response conditioning on the conversation history. Thus, PMIScore offers a clear interpretation of engagement. As directly computing PMI is intractable due to the complexity of dialogues, PMIScore learned it through a dual form of divergence. The algorithm includes generating positive and negative dialogue pairs, extracting embeddings by large language models (LLMs), and training a small neural network using a mutual information loss function. We validated PMIScore on both synthetic and real-world datasets. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of PMIScore in PMI estimation and the reasonableness of the PMI metric itself.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2026.
Builds on
21 of 36 references.
References · 21
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 820
- 2018MINE: Mutual Information Neural Estimationcited by 680
- 2017DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Datasetcited by 649
- 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 357
- 2019What makes a good conversation? How controllable attributes affect human judgmentscited by 140
- 2023Topical-Chat: Towards Knowledge-Grounded Open-Domain Conversationscited by 88
- 2023Scaling Sentence Embeddings with Large Language Modelscited by 83
- 2020A Large-Scale Chinese Short-Text Conversation Datasetcited by 77
- 2020KdConv: A Chinese Multi-domain Dialogue Dataset Towards Multi-turn Knowledge-driven Conversationcited by 59
9 more
- 2019Towards Coherent and Engaging Spoken Dialog Response Generation Using Automatic Conversation Evaluatorscited by 34
- 2024Benchmarking LLMs' Judgments with No Gold Standardcited by 19
- 2018Topic-based Evaluation for Conversational Botscited by 16
- 2018Water from Two Rocks: Maximizing the Mutual Informationcited by 10
- 2023Overview of Robust and Multilingual Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Open-Domain Dialogue Systems at DSTC 11 Track 4cited by 10
- 2020Learning and Strongly Truthful Multi-Task Peer Prediction: A Variational Approachcited by 8
- 2023C-PMI: Conditional Pointwise Mutual Information for Turn-level Dialogue Evaluationcited by 5
- 2021Representation Learning for Conversational Data using Discourse Mutual Information Maximizationcited by 4
- 2024Proper Dataset Valuation by Pointwise Mutual Informationcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.