Bodhi VLM: Privacy-Alignment Modeling for Hierarchical Visual Representations in Vision Backbones and VLM Encoders via Bottom-Up and Top-Down Feature Search
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning systems that preserve privacy often inject noise into hierarchical visual representations; a central challenge is to model how such perturbations align with a declared privacy budget in a way that is interpretable and applicable across vision backbones and vision--language models (VLMs). We propose Bodhi VLM, a privacy-alignment modeling framework for hierarchical neural representations: it (1) links sensitive concepts to layer-wise grouping via NCP and MDAV-based clustering; (2) locates sensitive feature regions using bottom-up (BUA) and top-down (TDA) strategies over multi-scale representations (e.g., feature pyramids or vision-encoder layers); and (3) uses an Expectation-Maximization Privacy Assessment (EMPA) module to produce an interpretable budget-alignment signal by comparing the fitted sensitive-feature distribution to an evaluator-specified reference (e.g., Laplace or Gaussian with scale c/ε). The output is reference-relative and is not a formal differential-privacy estimator. We formalize BUA/TDA over hierarchical feature structures and validate the framework on object detectors (YOLO, PPDPTS, DETR) and on the visual encoders of VLMs (CLIP, LLaVA, BLIP). BUA and TDA yield comparable deviation trends; EMPA provides a stable alignment signal under the reported setups. We compare with generic discrepancy baselines (Chi-square, K-L, MMD) and with task-relevant baselines (MomentReg, NoiseMLE, Wass-1). Results are reported as mean±std over multiple seeds with confidence intervals in the supplementary materials. This work contributes a learnable, interpretable modeling perspective for privacy-aligned hierarchical representations rather than a post hoc audit only. Source code: hrefhttps://github.com/mabo1215/bodhi-vlm.gitBodhi-VLM GitHub repository
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2026.
Builds on
14 of 26 references.
References · 14
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,036
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,630
- 2020MOT20: A benchmark for multi object tracking in crowded scenescited by 357
- 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 334
2 more
- 2017Neural Expectation Maximizationcited by 123
- 2026Differentially Private Multimodal In-Context Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025MultiPriv: Benchmarking Individual-Level Privacy Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
- 2025On the Robustness of Vision-Language Models in Zero-shot Privacy Classification
- 2024The Phantom Menace: Unmasking Privacy Leakages in Vision-Language Models
- 2024Privacy-Aware Visual Language Models
- 2026DP^2-VL: Private Photo Dataset Protection by Data Poisoning for Vision-Language Models
- 2026Which private attributes do VLMs agree on and predict well?
- 2026The Vision Encoder as a Privacy Boundary: Visual-Token Side Channels in Encoder-Free Vision-Language Models
- 2025Beyond Blanket Masking: Examining Granularity for Privacy Protection in Images Captured by Blind and Low Vision Users