mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Design and evaluation of an agentic workflow for crisis-related synthetic tweet datasets

arXiv 2603.13625 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2026cs.CL cs.LG cs.MAcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

Twitter (now X) has become an important source of social media data for situational awareness during crises. Crisis informatics research has widely used tweets from Twitter to develop and evaluate artificial intelligence (AI) systems for various crisis-relevant tasks, such as extracting locations and estimating damage levels from tweets to support damage assessment. However, recent changes in Twitter's data access policies have made it increasingly difficult to curate real-world tweet datasets related to crises. Moreover, existing curated tweet datasets are limited to past crisis events in specific contexts and are costly to annotate at scale. These limitations constrain the development and evaluation of AI systems used in crisis informatics. To address these limitations, we introduce an agentic workflow for generating crisis-related synthetic tweet datasets. The workflow iteratively generates synthetic tweets conditioned on prespecified target characteristics, evaluates them using predefined compliance checks, and incorporates structured feedback to refine them in subsequent iterations. As a case study, we apply the workflow to generate synthetic tweet datasets relevant to post-earthquake damage assessment. We show that the workflow can generate synthetic tweets that capture their target labels for location and damage level. We further demonstrate that the resulting synthetic tweet datasets can be used to evaluate AI systems on damage assessment tasks like geolocalization and damage level prediction. Our results indicate that the workflow offers a flexible and scalable alternative to real-world tweet data curation, enabling the systematic generation of synthetic social media data across diverse crisis events, societal contexts, and crisis informatics applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 10 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2026.

Builds on

10 of 30 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  2. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  3. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
  4. 2024On LLMs-Driven Synthetic Data Generation, Curation, and Evaluation: A Surveycited by 240
  5. 2023Machine Learning for Synthetic Data Generation: A Reviewcited by 118
  6. 2025Synthetic Data Generation Using Large Language Models: Advances in Text and Codecited by 61
  7. 2014Processing Social Media Messages in Mass Emergency: A Surveycited by 50
  8. 2025Harnessing Large Language Models for Disaster Management: A Surveycited by 20
  9. 2024RIP Twitter API: A eulogy to its vast research contributionscited by 4
  10. 2025Generating Synthetic Oracle Datasets to Analyze Noise Impact: A Study on Building Function Classification Using Tweetscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026NodeSynth: Socially Aligned Synthetic Data for AI Evaluation
  2. 2026CaST: Causal Discovery via Spatio-Temporal Graphs in Disaster Tweets
  3. 2026Model in Distress: Sentiment Analysis on French Synthetic Social Media
  4. 2025BEYONDWORDS is All You Need: Agentic Generative AI based Social Media Themes Extractor
  5. 2026Treadstone: A Social-Media-Inspired Platform for Multi-Agent Collaborative Data Analysis ↗
  6. 2026Agentic Detection of Online Conspiracies
  7. 2021The challenges of temporal alignment on Twitter during crises
  8. 2026Can We Defend Against AI-Generated Video Attacks on Real-World Crisis Events? A Systematic Evaluation of Detectors, Generators and Social Dissemination