The Challenge of Out-Of-Distribution Detection in Motor Imagery BCIs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine Learning classifiers used in Brain-Computer Interfaces make classifications based on the distribution of data they were trained on. When they need to make inferences on samples that fall outside of this distribution, they can only make blind guesses. Instead of allowing random guesses, these Out-of-Distribution (OOD) samples should be detected and rejected. We study OOD detection in Motor Imagery BCIs by training a model on some classes and observing whether unfamiliar classes can be detected based on increased uncertainty. We test seven different OOD detection techniques and one more method that has been claimed to boost the quality of OOD detection. Our findings show that OOD detection for Brain-Computer Interfaces is more challenging than in other machine learning domains due to the high uncertainty inherent in classifying EEG signals. For many subjects, uncertainty for in-distribution classes can still be higher than for out-of-distribution classes. As a result, many OOD detection methods prove to be ineffective, though MC Dropout performed best. Additionally, we show that high in-distribution classification performance predicts high OOD detection performance, suggesting that improved accuracy can also lead to improved robustness. Our research demonstrates a setup for studying how models deal with unfamiliar EEG data and evaluates methods that are robust to these unfamiliar inputs. OOD detection can improve the overall safety and reliability of BCIs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2026.
Builds on
17 of 32 references.
References · 17
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,299
- 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 802
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 600
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
- 2021Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A Simple Baselinecited by 200
- 2024Benchmarking Uncertainty Disentanglement: Specialized Uncertainties for Specialized Taskscited by 78
- 2023Prototype-based Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification for Cross-modal Retrievalcited by 23
- 2025From Aleatoric to Epistemic: Exploring Uncertainty Quantification Techniques in Artificial Intelligencecited by 18
5 more
- 2022Toward reliable signals decoding for electroencephalogram: A benchmark study to EEGNeXcited by 17
- 2022Evaluating Latent Space Robustness and Uncertainty of EEG-ML Models under Realistic Distribution Shiftscited by 16
- 2022A Comprehensive Review of Trends, Applications and Challenges In Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 5
- 2024Uncertainty Quantification for cross-subject Motor Imagery classificationcited by 3
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification for Motor Imagery BCI -- Machine Learning vs. Deep Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.