mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Suppressing Domain-Specific Hallucination in Construction LLMs: A Knowledge Graph Foundation for GraphRAG and QLoRA on River and Sediment Control Technical Standards

arXiv 2603.13307 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2026cs.IR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper addresses the challenge of answering technical questions derived from Japan's River and Sediment Control Technical Standards -- a multi-volume regulatory document covering survey, planning, design, and maintenance of river levees, dams, and sabo structures -- using open-source large language models running entirely on local hardware. We implement and evaluate three complementary approaches: Case A (plain 20B LLM baseline), Case B (8B LLM with QLoRA domain fine-tuning on 715 graph-derived QA pairs), and Case C (20B LLM augmented with a Neo4j knowledge graph via GraphRAG). All three cases use the Swallow series of Japanese-adapted LLMs and are evaluated on a 100-question benchmark spanning 8 technical categories, judged automatically by an independent LLM (Qwen2.5-14B, score 0--3). The key finding is a performance inversion: the 8B QLoRA fine-tuned model (Case B) achieves a judge average of 2.92/3 -- surpassing both the 20B plain baseline (Case A: 2.29/3, +0.63) and the 20B GraphRAG approach (Case C: 2.62/3, +0.30) -- while running at 3× faster latency (14.2s vs. 42.2s for Case A). GraphRAG provides moderate gains (+0.33 over baseline) but is outperformed by domain-specific fine-tuning in both quality and efficiency. We document the full engineering pipeline, including knowledge graph construction (200 nodes, 268 relations), QLoRA training data generation from Neo4j relations, training on a single GPU (16 GB VRAM) using unsloth, GGUF Q4KM quantisation and Ollama deployment, and the graph retrieval and re-ranking design. High-level engineering lessons are distilled in the main body; implementation pitfalls and toolchain details are documented in Supplementary Materials.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.

Builds on

21 of 31 references.

References · 21

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  5. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
  6. 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
  7. 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,800
  8. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,442
  9. 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,411
  10. 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 873
  11. 2023Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmapcited by 663
  12. 2023Active Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 506
9 more
  1. 2024GaLore: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projectioncited by 447
  2. 2023Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 408
  3. 2023QA-LoRA: Quantization-Aware Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 154
  4. 2023Knowledge Graph Prompting for Multi-Document Question Answeringcited by 150
  5. 2022Improving the Domain Adaptation of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 126
  6. 2024Continual Pre-Training for Cross-Lingual LLM Adaptation: Enhancing Japanese Language Capabilitiescited by 111
  7. 2023MindMap: Knowledge Graph Prompting Sparks Graph of Thoughts in Large Language Modelscited by 73
  8. 2023Enhancing Knowledge Graph Construction Using Large Language Modelscited by 44
  9. 2024Building a Large Japanese Web Corpus for Large Language Modelscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.