Suppressing Domain-Specific Hallucination in Construction LLMs: A Knowledge Graph Foundation for GraphRAG and QLoRA on River and Sediment Control Technical Standards
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper addresses the challenge of answering technical questions derived from Japan's River and Sediment Control Technical Standards -- a multi-volume regulatory document covering survey, planning, design, and maintenance of river levees, dams, and sabo structures -- using open-source large language models running entirely on local hardware. We implement and evaluate three complementary approaches: Case A (plain 20B LLM baseline), Case B (8B LLM with QLoRA domain fine-tuning on 715 graph-derived QA pairs), and Case C (20B LLM augmented with a Neo4j knowledge graph via GraphRAG). All three cases use the Swallow series of Japanese-adapted LLMs and are evaluated on a 100-question benchmark spanning 8 technical categories, judged automatically by an independent LLM (Qwen2.5-14B, score 0--3). The key finding is a performance inversion: the 8B QLoRA fine-tuned model (Case B) achieves a judge average of 2.92/3 -- surpassing both the 20B plain baseline (Case A: 2.29/3, +0.63) and the 20B GraphRAG approach (Case C: 2.62/3, +0.30) -- while running at 3× faster latency (14.2s vs. 42.2s for Case A). GraphRAG provides moderate gains (+0.33 over baseline) but is outperformed by domain-specific fine-tuning in both quality and efficiency. We document the full engineering pipeline, including knowledge graph construction (200 nodes, 268 relations), QLoRA training data generation from Neo4j relations, training on a single GPU (16 GB VRAM) using unsloth, GGUF Q4KM quantisation and Ollama deployment, and the graph retrieval and re-ranking design. High-level engineering lessons are distilled in the main body; implementation pitfalls and toolchain details are documented in Supplementary Materials.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.
Builds on
21 of 31 references.
References · 21
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,800
- 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,442
- 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,411
- 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 873
- 2023Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmapcited by 663
- 2023Active Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 506
9 more
- 2024GaLore: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projectioncited by 447
- 2023Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 408
- 2023QA-LoRA: Quantization-Aware Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 154
- 2023Knowledge Graph Prompting for Multi-Document Question Answeringcited by 150
- 2022Improving the Domain Adaptation of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 126
- 2024Continual Pre-Training for Cross-Lingual LLM Adaptation: Enhancing Japanese Language Capabilitiescited by 111
- 2023MindMap: Knowledge Graph Prompting Sparks Graph of Thoughts in Large Language Modelscited by 73
- 2023Enhancing Knowledge Graph Construction Using Large Language Modelscited by 44
- 2024Building a Large Japanese Web Corpus for Large Language Modelscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.