Rooftop Wind Field Reconstruction Using Sparse Sensors: From Deterministic to Generative Learning Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Real-time rooftop wind-speed distribution is important for the safe operation of drones and urban air mobility systems, wind control systems, and rooftop utilization. However, rooftop flows show strong nonlinearity, separation, and cross-direction variability, which make flow field reconstruction from sparse sensors difficult. This study develops a learning-from-observation framework using wind-tunnel experimental data obtained by Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and compares Kriging interpolation with three deep learning models: UNet, Vision Transformer Autoencoder (ViTAE), and Conditional Wasserstein GAN (CWGAN). We evaluate two training strategies, single wind-direction training (SDT) and mixed wind-direction training (MDT), across sensor densities from 5 to 30, test robustness under sensor position perturbations of plus or minus 1 grid, and optimize sensor placement via Proper Orthogonal Decomposition with QR decomposition. Results show that deep learning methods can reconstruct rooftop wind fields from sparse sensor data effectively. Compared with Kriging interpolation, the deep learning models improved SSIM by up to 32.7%, FAC2 by 24.2%, and NMSE by 27.8%. Mixed wind-direction training further improved performance, with gains of up to 173.7% in SSIM, 16.7% in FAC2, and 98.3% in MG compared with single-direction training. The results also show that sensor configuration, optimization, and training strategy should be considered jointly for reliable deployment. QR-based optimization improved robustness by up to 27.8% under sensor perturbations, although with metric-dependent trade-offs. Training on experimental rather than simulated data also provides practical guidance for method selection and sensor placement in different scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2026.
Builds on
13 of 72 references.
References · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
- 2021ViTAE: Vision Transformer Advanced by Exploring Intrinsic Inductive Biascited by 216
- 2018Recent Advances in Autoencoder-Based Representation Learningcited by 130
- 2017Data-Driven Sparse Sensor Placement for Reconstructioncited by 57
- 2021Global field reconstruction from sparse sensors with Voronoi tessellation-assisted deep learningcited by 55
- 2023Efficient deep data assimilation with sparse observations and time-varying sensorscited by 14
- 2025Machine learning for modelling unstructured grid data in computational physics: a reviewcited by 12
- 2016Review: Nonstationary Spatial Modeling, with Emphasis on Process Convolution and Covariate-Driven Approachescited by 7
- 2019Learning from Irregularly Sampled Data for Endomicroscopy Super-resolution: A Comparative Study of Sparse and Dense Approachescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.