Revisiting Model Stitching In the Foundation Model Era
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model stitching, connecting early layers of one model (source) to later layers of another (target) via a light stitch layer, has served as a probe of representational compatibility. Prior work finds that models trained on the same dataset remain stitchable (negligible accuracy drop) despite different initializations or objectives. We revisit stitching for Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) that vary in objectives, data, and modality mix (e.g., CLIP, DINOv2, SigLIP 2) and ask: Are heterogeneous VFMs stitchable? We introduce a systematic protocol spanning the stitch points, stitch layer families, training losses, and downstream tasks. Three findings emerge. (1) Stitch layer training matters: conventional approaches that match the intermediate features at the stitch point or optimize the task loss end-to-end struggle to retain accuracy, especially at shallow stitch points. (2) With a simple feature-matching loss at the target model's penultimate layer, heterogeneous VFMs become reliably stitchable across vision tasks. (3) For deep stitch points, the stitched model can surpass either constituent model at only a small inference overhead (for the stitch layer). Building on these findings, we further propose the VFM Stitch Tree (VST), which shares early layers across VFMs while retaining their later layers, yielding a controllable accuracy-latency trade-off for multimodal LLMs that often leverage multiple VFMs. Taken together, our study elevates stitching from a diagnostic probe to a practical recipe for integrating complementary VFM strengths and pinpointing where their representations align or diverge.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2026.
Builds on
44 of 56 references.
References · 44
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,588
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,231
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,009
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,857
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,827
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,915
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,027
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,389
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,310
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,068
- 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,823
32 more
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,649
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,709
- 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,705
- 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,637
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,384
- 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,179
- 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,154
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,101
- 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,068
- 2024Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMscited by 827
- 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 808
- 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 792
- 2022PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Modelcited by 764
- 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 723
- 2017Functional Map of the Worldcited by 338
- 2023Data Filtering Networkscited by 248
- 2014Understanding image representations by measuring their equivariance and equivalencecited by 241
- 2021Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural Representationscited by 204
- 2024TinyLLaVA: A Framework of Small-scale Large Multimodal Modelscited by 164
- 2019Benchmarking the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Modelscited by 111
- 2024Multimodal Autoregressive Pre-training of Large Vision Encoderscited by 109
- 2022Deep Model Reassemblycited by 78
- 2021Similarity and Matching of Neural Network Representationscited by 77
- 2023Stitchable Neural Networkscited by 26
- 2024Fine-Tuning is Fine, if Calibratedcited by 24
- 2024Lessons and Insights from a Unifying Study of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) in Visual Recognitioncited by 16
- 2024How to Benchmark Vision Foundation Models for Semantic Segmentation?cited by 15
- 2023Model Stitching: Looking For Functional Similarity Between Representationscited by 10
- 2023Stitched ViTs are Flexible Vision Backbonescited by 8
- 2025AVA-Bench: Atomic Visual Ability Benchmark for Vision Foundation Modelscited by 5
- 2024How not to Stitch Representations to Measure Similarity: Task Loss Matching versus Direct Matchingcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026UniStitch: Unifying Semantic and Geometric Features for Image Stitching
- 2026PRISM-VLM: A Multi-Axis Discriminative Benchmark for Compact Vision-Language Models
- 2026Underrepresented in Foundation Model Pretraining Data? A One-Shot Probe
- 2023ImageBind: One Embedding Space To Bind Them All
- 2025VLMs Can Aggregate Scattered Training Patches
- 2024Reconstructing the Image Stitching Pipeline: Integrating Fusion and Rectangling into a Unified Inpainting Model
- 2026Understanding the Impact of Geometric Foundation Models on Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026Diagnosing the Sources of Compositional Failure in Vision-Language Models: A Controlled Analysis