mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Chemical Reaction Networks Learn Better than Spiking Neural Networks

arXiv 2603.12060 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AI math.STcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We mathematically prove that chemical reaction networks without hidden layers can solve tasks for which spiking neural networks require hidden layers. Our proof uses the deterministic mass-action kinetics formulation of chemical reaction networks. Specifically, we prove that a certain reaction network without hidden layers can learn a classification task previously proved to be achievable by a spiking neural network with hidden layers. We provide analytical regret bounds for the global behavior of the network and analyze its asymptotic behavior and Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension. In a numerical experiment, we confirm the learning capacity of the proposed chemical reaction network for classifying handwritten digits in pixel images, and we show that it solves the task more accurately and efficiently than a spiking neural network with hidden layers. This provides a motivation for machine learning in chemical computers and a mathematical explanation for how biological cells might exhibit more efficient learning behavior within biochemical reaction networks than neuronal networks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2026.

Builds on

4 of 27 references.

References · 4

  1. 2017On the Properties of the Softmax Function with Application in Game Theory and Reinforcement Learningcited by 142
  2. 2022On the infinite-depth limit of finite-width neural networkscited by 22
  3. 2021Neuronal Network Inference and Membrane Potential Model using Multivariate Hawkes Processescited by 5
  4. 2024CHANI: Correlation-based Hawkes Aggregation of Neurons with bio-Inspirationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.