Noise-Space Attribution and Control of Chunk-Boundary Artifact
On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion and flow policies for robotics
Abstract (arXiv)
Action chunking is widely used in generative visuomotor policies, yet the recurring execution discontinuities at chunk boundaries still lack a mechanistic explanation. This paper treats chunk-boundary artifact as an analyzable mechanism variable. We first show that successful and failed episodes separate stably on artifact metrics. We then show that, in stochastic action-chunked policies, fixing the observation context and changing only latent noise is sufficient to modulate artifact systematically. On the same Diffusion Policy checkpoint, comparisons among DDPM, zero-variance DDPM, and DDIM further show that this local controllability depends on whether the information path from initial noise to action output remains intact. Finally, from controlled interventions at fixed local execution states, we find that artifact changes can carry through to final outcome, and that the preferred direction can reverse even within the same task: some contexts achieve higher success under lower artifact, whereas others achieve higher success under higher artifact. In a representative high-artifact-favoring key context selected by held-out matched-continuation validation, success rate increases from 0.033 to 0.717. These results show that chunk-boundary artifact is not a mere execution-side by-product, but a variable in noise space that can be attributed, controlled, and mechanistically linked to task outcome.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 10 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2026.
Builds on
10 of 11 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Steering Your Diffusion Policy with Latent Space Reinforcement Learning18 Jun
- 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusion7 Mar
Other references · 8
- 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,297
- 2023Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardwarecited by 1,490
- 2023LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learningcited by 1,338
- 2025Real-Time Execution of Action Chunking Flow Policiescited by 199
- 2024InitNO: Boosting Text-to-Image Diffusion Models via Initial Noise Optimizationcited by 123
- 2023NoiseCLR: A Contrastive Learning Approach for Unsupervised Discovery of Interpretable Directions in Diffusion Modelscited by 46
- 2026Learning Native Continuation for Action Chunking Flow Policiescited by 18
- 2026Real-Time Robot Execution with Masked Action Chunkingcited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Measuring the Stability Assumption Behind Action Chunking
- 2026FocalPolicy: Frequency-Optimized Chunking and Locally Anchored Flow Matching for Coherent Visuomotor Policy
- 2026AutoIntervene: Calibrated Intervention for Action-Chunking Imitation Learning Policies
- 2026DREAM-Chunk: Reactive Action Chunking with Latent World Model
- 2026When to Switch: Reliable Action-Chunk Extension for Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026Understanding Multimodal Failure in Action-Chunking Behavioral Cloning
- 2026Adaptive Action Chunking at Inference-time for Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026Commit While Futures Agree: Consequence-Aware Adaptive Action Chunking for Robot Manipulation ↗