mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Post-Training for Generative Recommenders: Why Exponential Reward-Weighted SFT Outperforms RLHF

arXiv 2603.10279 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Preference alignment for recommenders and RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

Aligning generative recommender systems to user preferences via post-training is critical for closing the gap between next-item prediction and actual recommendation quality. Existing post-training methods are ill-suited for production-scale systems: RLHF methods reward hack due to noisy user feedback and unreliable reward models, offline RL alternatives require propensity scores that are unavailable, and online interaction is infeasible. We identify exponential reward-weighted SFT with weights w = exp(r/λ) as uniquely suited to this setting, and provide the theoretical and empirical foundations that explain why. By optimizing directly on observed rewards without querying a learned reward model, the method is immune to reward hacking, requires no propensity scores, and is fully offline. We prove the first policy improvement guarantees for this setting under noisy rewards, showing that the gap scales only logarithmically with catalog size and remains informative even for large item catalogs. Crucially, we show that temperature λ explicitly and quantifiably controls the robustness-improvement tradeoff, providing practitioners with a single interpretable regularization hyperparameter with theoretical grounding. Experiments on three open-source and one proprietary dataset against four baselines confirm that exponential reward weighting is simple, scalable, and consistently outperforms RLHF-based alternatives.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Preference alignment for recommenders and RAG, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 24 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.

Builds on

24 of 36 references.

References · 24

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  6. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
  7. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
  8. 2018Self-Attentive Sequential Recommendationcited by 1,169
  9. 2015Image-based Recommendations on Styles and Substitutescited by 702
  10. 2023A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendationcited by 378
  11. 2022The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Modelscited by 312
  12. 2020Critic Regularized Regressioncited by 269
12 more
  1. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 246
  2. 2023Recommender Systems with Generative Retrievalcited by 191
  3. 2024Actions Speak Louder than Words: Trillion-Parameter Sequential Transducers for Generative Recommendationscited by 184
  4. 2025OneRec: Unifying Retrieve and Rank with Generative Recommender and Iterative Preference Alignmentcited by 167
  5. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning in Large Discrete Action Spacescited by 158
  6. 2024Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithmscited by 139
  7. 2024A Review of Modern Recommender Systems Using Generative Models (Gen-RecSys)cited by 58
  8. 2023The Alignment Ceiling: Objective Mismatch in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 42
  9. 2023Leftover Lunch: Advantage-based Offline Reinforcement Learning for Language Modelscited by 17
  10. 2025Offline RL by Reward-Weighted Fine-Tuning for Conversation Optimizationcited by 10
  11. 2022Local Policy Improvement for Recommender Systemscited by 8
  12. 2025GR-LLMs: Recent Advances in Generative Recommendation Based on Large Language Modelscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Reward Balancing Revisited: Enhancing Offline Reinforcement Learning for Recommender Systems
  2. 2026SAGE: Sequence-level Adaptive Gradient Evolution for Generative Recommendation
  3. 2026FlexRec: Adapting LLM-based Recommenders for Flexible Needs via Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2023A General Offline Reinforcement Learning Framework for Interactive Recommendation
  5. 2023Towards Validating Long-Term User Feedbacks in Interactive Recommendation Systems
  6. 2026PROMISE: Process Reward Models Unlock Test-Time Scaling Laws in Generative Recommendations
  7. 2026RecRM-Bench: Benchmarking Multidimensional Reward Modeling for Agentic Recommender Systems
  8. 2026Learning from Unreachable Rewards: Hint-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning for Generative Recommendation