mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Impact of Markov Decision Process Design on Sim-to-Real Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2603.09427 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has demonstrated strong potential for industrial process control, yet policies trained in simulation often suffer from a significant sim-to-real gap when deployed on physical hardware. This work systematically analyzes how core Markov Decision Process (MDP) design choices -- state composition, target inclusion, reward formulation, termination criteria, and environment dynamics models -- affect this transfer. Using a color mixing task, we evaluate different MDP configurations and mixing dynamics across simulation and real-world experiments. We validate our findings on physical hardware, demonstrating that physics-based dynamics models achieve up to 50% real-world success under strict precision constraints where simplified models fail entirely. Our results provide practical MDP design guidelines for deploying RL in industrial process control.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.

Builds on

6 of 16 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2017Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policiescited by 314
  3. 2018A Tour of Reinforcement Learning: The View from Continuous Controlcited by 129
  4. 2021Why Generalization in RL is Difficult: Epistemic POMDPs and Implicit Partial Observabilitycited by 102
  5. 2019Data-driven Economic NMPC using Reinforcement Learningcited by 55
  6. 2025The Crucial Role of Problem Formulation in Real-World Reinforcement Learningcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.