mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interpretable Aneurysm Classification via 3D Concept Bottleneck Models: Integrating Morphological and Hemodynamic Clinical Features

arXiv 2603.07399 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2026cs.CV eess.SPcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We are concerned with the challenge of reliably classifying and assessing intracranial aneurysms using deep learning without compromising clinical transparency. While traditional black-box models achieve high predictive accuracy, their lack of inherent interpretability remains a significant barrier to clinical adoption and regulatory approval. Explainability is paramount in medical modeling to ensure that AI-driven diagnoses align with established neurosurgical principles. Unlike traditional eXplainable AI (XAI) methods -- such as saliency maps, which often provide post-hoc, non-causal visual correlations -- Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) offer a robust alternative by constraining the model's internal logic to human-understandable clinical indices. In this article, we propose an end-to-end 3D Concept Bottleneck framework that maps high-dimensional neuroimaging features to a discrete set of morphological and hemodynamic concepts for aneurysm identification. We implemented this pipeline using a pre-trained 3D ResNet-34 backbone and a 3D DenseNet-121 to extract features from CTA volumes, which were subsequently processed through a soft bottleneck layer representing human-interpretable clinical concepts. The model was optimized using a joint-loss function to balance diagnostic focal loss and concept mean squared error (MSE), validated via stratified five-fold cross-validation. Our results demonstrate a peak task classification accuracy of 93.33% +/- 4.5% for the ResNet-34 architecture and 91.43% +/- 5.8% for the DenseNet-121 model. Furthermore, the implementation of 8-pass Test-Time Augmentation (TTA) yielded a robust mean accuracy of 88.31%, ensuring diagnostic stability during inference. By maintaining an accuracy-generalization gap of less than 0.04, this framework proves that high predictive performance can be achieved without sacrificing interpretability.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2026.

Builds on

3 of 18 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
  2. 2022Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 289
  3. 2019What Clinicians Want: Contextualizing Explainable Machine Learning for Clinical End Usecited by 134

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.