mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Yerkes-Dodson Curve for AI Agents: Emergent Cooperation Under Environmental Pressure in Multi-Agent LLM Simulations

arXiv 2603.07360 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

Designing environments that maximize the rate of emergent behavior development in AI agents remains an open problem. We present the first systematic study of stress-performance relationships in large language model (LLM) multi-agent systems, drawing an explicit parallel to the Yerkes-Dodson law from cognitive psychology. Using a grid-world survival arena, we conduct 22 experiments across four phases, varying environmental pressure through resource scarcity (upkeep cost) and reproductive competition (sexual selection). Our key finding is that cooperative behavior follows an inverted-U curve: trade interactions peak at 29 under medium pressure (upkeep=5), while both low and extreme pressure produce 8--12 trades. Under extreme pressure, behavioral repertoire collapses to movement-only within 5--12 turns. We further show that sexual selection -- a softer pressure mechanism where all agents survive but not all reproduce -- eliminates inter-agent aggression entirely and produces communicative behavior absent under survival pressure. These results suggest that environmental pressure calibration is a viable curriculum design strategy for LLM agent development, analogous to the inverted-U relationship between arousal and performance in biological systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2026.

Builds on

6 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Understanding LLM Agent Behaviours via Game Theory: Strategy Recognition, Biases and Multi-Agent Dynamics8 Dec
  2. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior7 Apr

Other references · 4

  1. 2019Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurriculacited by 308
  2. 2017Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmascited by 206
  3. 2021Open-Ended Learning Leads to Generally Capable Agentscited by 177
  4. 2017Intrinsic Motivation and Automatic Curricula via Asymmetric Self-Playcited by 139

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Energy Society: A Simulation Environment for Studying Agent Cooperation under Survival Pressure
  2. 2024Cooperate or Collapse: Emergence of Sustainable Cooperation in a Society of LLM Agents
  3. 2026Collective cooperation without individual fidelity in LLM agents
  4. 2026Cooperative Profiles Predict Multi-Agent LLM Team Performance in AI for Science Workflows
  5. 2025The Hunger Game Debate: On the Emergence of Over-Competition in Multi-Agent Systems
  6. 2025Evaluating Cooperative Resilience in Multiagent Systems: A Comparison Between Humans and LLMs ↗
  7. 2026Evolutionary Dynamics of Cooperation in Next-Generation LLM Agent Systems: A Cross-Provider Empirical Extension
  8. 2025Will Systems of LLM Agents Cooperate: An Investigation into a Social Dilemma