mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Two Frames Matter: A Temporal Attack for Text-to-Video Model Jailbreaking

arXiv 2603.07028 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2026cs.CR cs.CVcited by 3

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Recent text-to-video (T2V) models can synthesize complex videos from lightweight natural language prompts, raising urgent concerns about safety alignment in the event of misuse in the real world. Prior jailbreak attacks typically rewrite unsafe prompts into paraphrases that evade content filters while preserving meaning. Yet, these approaches often still retain explicit sensitive cues in the input text and therefore overlook a more profound, video-specific weakness. In this paper, we identify a temporal trajectory infilling vulnerability of T2V systems under fragmented prompts: when the prompt specifies only sparse boundary conditions (e.g., start and end frames) and leaves the intermediate evolution underspecified, the model may autonomously reconstruct a plausible trajectory that includes harmful intermediate frames, despite the prompt appearing benign to input or output side filtering. Building on this observation, we propose TFM. This fragmented prompting framework converts an originally unsafe request into a temporally sparse two-frame extraction and further reduces overtly sensitive cues via implicit substitution. Extensive evaluations across multiple open-source and commercial T2V models demonstrate that TFM consistently enhances jailbreak effectiveness, achieving up to a 12% increase in attack success rate on commercial systems. Our findings highlight the need for temporally aware safety mechanisms that account for model-driven completion beyond prompt surface form.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2026.

Builds on

8 of 17 references.

References · 8

  1. 2022Imagen Video: High Definition Video Generation with Diffusion Modelscited by 1,765
  2. 2024Open-Sora: Democratizing Efficient Video Production for Allcited by 637
  3. 2023Ring-A-Bell! How Reliable are Concept Removal Methods for Diffusion Models?cited by 239
  4. 2023MMA-Diffusion: MultiModal Attack on Diffusion Modelscited by 184
  5. 2024T2VSafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Text-to-Video Generative Modelscited by 66
  6. 2024SafeWatch: An Efficient Safety-Policy Following Video Guardrail Model with Transparent Explanationscited by 37
  7. 2025T2V-OptJail: Discrete Prompt Optimization for Text-to-Video Jailbreak Attackscited by 18
  8. 2025Jailbreaking on Text-to-Video Models via Scene Splitting Strategycited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026TempJail: Temporal Jailbreak Attacks against Image-to-Video Generation Models
  2. 2026TempJail: Temporal Jailbreak Attack against Large Vision-Language Models via Subtitle Scheduling
  3. 2026Jailbreaking Multimodal Large Language Models using Multi-Clip Video
  4. 2026SceneJail: Exploiting Video Scenario Context to Jailbreak Multimodal LLMs
  5. 2026JANUS: A Lightweight Framework for Jailbreaking Text-to-Image Models via Distribution Optimization
  6. 2026MMJailBench: A Factorized Benchmark for Disentangling Multimodal Jailbreak Vulnerabilities
  7. 2025T2VAttack: Adversarial Attack on Text-to-Video Diffusion Models
  8. 2025Innocence in the Crossfire: Roles of Skip Connections in Jailbreaking Visual Language Models