mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HGT-Scheduler: Deep Reinforcement Learning for the Job Shop Scheduling Problem via Heterogeneous Graph Transformers

arXiv 2603.06777 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.ETcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Job Shop Scheduling Problem (JSSP) is commonly formulated as a disjunctive graph in which nodes represent operations and edges encode technological precedence constraints as well as machine-sharing conflicts. Most existing reinforcement learning approaches model this graph as homogeneous, merging job-precedence and machine-contention edges into a single relation type. Such a simplification overlooks the intrinsic heterogeneity of the problem structure and may lead to the loss of critical relational information. To address this limitation, we propose the Heterogeneous Graph Transformer (HGT)-Scheduler, a reinforcement learning framework that models the JSSP as a heterogeneous graph. The proposed architecture leverages a Heterogeneous Graph Transformer to capture type-specific relational patterns through edge-type-dependent attention mechanisms applied to precedence and contention relations. The scheduling policy is trained using Proximal Policy Optimization. The effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated on the Fisher--Thompson benchmark instances. On the FT06 instance, the HGT-Scheduler achieves an optimality gap of 8.4%, statistically outperforming both an identical architecture that ignores edge types (p = 0.011) and a standard Graph Isomorphism Network baseline. On the larger FT10 instance, the approach demonstrates favorable scalability. However, under a 50,000-step training limit, the performance of heterogeneous and homogeneous graph models is comparable, suggesting that edge-type awareness requires longer training horizons for larger problem instances. Ablation analyses further indicate that a three-layer attention architecture provides the best performance. Overall, the results confirm that explicitly modeling distinct edge semantics improves the learning of effective scheduling policies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.

Builds on

13 of 42 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  3. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  4. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
  5. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,684
  6. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
  7. 2019Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networkcited by 732
  8. 2018Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: a Methodological Tour d'Horizoncited by 612
  9. 2020Heterogeneous Graph Transformercited by 581
  10. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overviewcited by 327
  11. 2020Learning to Dispatch for Job Shop Scheduling via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 139
  12. 2021A Reinforcement Learning Environment For Job-Shop Schedulingcited by 21
1 more
  1. 2024Graph Neural Networks for Job Shop Scheduling Problems: A Surveycited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.