mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Neural-Surrogate Co-Design of Aerodynamic Shape and Control

arXiv 2603.06760 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2026cs.RO cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Control co-design jointly optimizes a robot's physical design and its controller. Existing techniques are limited in the number of model parameters and the complexity of the physical models they can handle. In this paper, we propose a gradient-based bilevel formulation that replaces the dynamics models of earlier techniques with a differentiable neural surrogate and differentiates through the trajectory optimizer using a structure-exploiting approach. We validate the framework on fixed-wing gliders, using NeuralFoil as the aerodynamic surrogate. The tasks are maximum-distance gliding, minimum-distance landing, and perching. Experiments on 2D airfoils and 3D wings show that our method runs about five times faster than a state-of-the-art evolutionary baseline. It also outperforms pipelines that optimize aerodynamic proxy metrics.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.

Builds on

4 of 36 references.

References · 4

  1. 2025NeuralFoil: An Airfoil Aerodynamics Analysis Tool Using Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 11
  2. 2023Revisiting Implicit Differentiation for Learning Problems in Optimal Controlcited by 8
  3. 2019Robot Co-design: Beyond the Monotone Casecited by 5
  4. 2023Co-Design Optimisation of Morphing Topology and Control of Winged Dronescited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.