mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Switchable Activation Networks

arXiv 2603.06601 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks, and more recently large-scale generative models such as large language models (LLMs) and large vision-action models (LVAs), achieve remarkable performance across diverse domains, yet their prohibitive computational cost hinders deployment in resource-constrained environments. Existing efficiency techniques offer only partial remedies: dropout improves regularization during training but leaves inference unchanged, while pruning and low-rank factorization compress models post hoc into static forms with limited adaptability. Here we introduce SWAN (Switchable Activation Networks), a framework that equips each neural unit with a deterministic, input-dependent binary gate, enabling the network to learn when a unit should be active or inactive. This dynamic control mechanism allocates computation adaptively, reducing redundancy while preserving accuracy. Unlike traditional pruning, SWAN does not simply shrink networks after training; instead, it learns structured, context-dependent activation patterns that support both efficient dynamic inference and conversion into compact dense models for deployment. By reframing efficiency as a problem of learned activation control, SWAN unifies the strengths of sparsity, pruning, and adaptive inference within a single paradigm. Beyond computational gains, this perspective suggests a more general principle of neural computation, where activation is not fixed but context-dependent, pointing toward sustainable AI, edge intelligence, and future architectures inspired by the adaptability of biological brains.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2026.

Builds on

26 of 38 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  5. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  6. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  7. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  8. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  9. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  10. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  11. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 3,080
  12. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,887
14 more
  1. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,367
  2. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
  3. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  4. 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,079
  5. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
  6. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 979
  7. 2022Mixture-of-Experts with Expert Choice Routingcited by 623
  8. 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 583
  9. 2019Data-Free Quantization Through Weight Equalization and Bias Correctioncited by 336
  10. 2017SkipNet: Learning Dynamic Routing in Convolutional Networkscited by 332
  11. 2023DepGraph: Towards Any Structural Pruningcited by 203
  12. 2017BlockDrop: Dynamic Inference Paths in Residual Networkscited by 189
  13. 2023Structured Pruning for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A surveycited by 122
  14. 2018Channel Gating Neural Networkscited by 80

Built on by

Not cited yet.