What Makes Position Zero Special? A Mechanistic Study of Position Zero Attention Sinks in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transformers frequently allocate disproportionate attention to specific tokens, a phenomenon known as attention sinks. Causal large language models reliably form one at position zero, though its role remains debated. We approach this question from a mechanistic perspective, tracing how the position-zero sink arises from the model's internal computation. We identify a two-block subnetwork responsible for this behavior, which we term the P0-Sink Circuit, and show it arises purely from the structural properties of causal attention, requiring no semantic content. We further validate through from-scratch pre-training experiments that two proposed parameter-free methods effectively accelerate P0 sink formation, and find that earlier sink formation benefits pre-training and improves downstream performance. Both methods outperform the Transformer baseline and achieve performance comparable to Gated Attention across comprehensive settings. Code is available now at https://github.com/Pryest/flash-linear-attention.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.
Builds on
22 of 27 references.
References · 22
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,115
- 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,425
- 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 776
- 2024Massive Activations in Large Language Modelscited by 277
- 2025Gated Attention for Large Language Models: Non-linearity, Sparsity, and Attention-Sink-Freecited by 266
- 2024When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical Viewcited by 200
- 2025Why do LLMs attend to the first token?cited by 122
- 2023LM-Infinite: Zero-Shot Extreme Length Generalization for Large Language Modelscited by 120
- 2024Unveiling and Harnessing Hidden Attention Sinks: Enhancing Large Language Models without Training through Attention Calibrationcited by 70
10 more
- 2020Talking-Heads Attentioncited by 57
- 2021Theoretical Foundations of t-SNE for Visualizing High-Dimensional Clustered Datacited by 55
- 2025Rope to Nope and Back Again: A New Hybrid Attention Strategycited by 46
- 2025Vision Transformers Don't Need Trained Registerscited by 39
- 2025Systematic Outliers in Large Language Modelscited by 32
- 2025The emergence of sparse attention: impact of data distribution and benefits of repetitioncited by 25
- 2026A Unified View of Attention and Residual Sinks: Outlier-Driven Rescaling is Essential for Transformer Trainingcited by 21
- 2025Attention Sinks: A 'Catch, Tag, Release' Mechanism for Embeddingscited by 16
- 2025Identifying and Evaluating Inactive Heads in Pretrained LLMscited by 8
- 2026Explicit Multi-head Attention for Inter-head Interaction in Large Language Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.