mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Addressing the Ecological Fallacy in Larger LMs with Human Context

arXiv 2603.05928 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language model training and inference ignore a fundamental linguistic fact -- there is a dependence between multiple sequences of text written by the same person. Prior work has shown that addressing this form of textitecological fallacy can greatly improve the performance of multiple smaller (~124M) GPT-based models. In this work, we ask if addressing the ecological fallacy by modeling the author's language context with a specific LM task (called HuLM) can provide similar benefits for a larger-scale model, an 8B Llama model. To this end, we explore variants that process an author's language in the context of their other temporally ordered texts. We study the effect of pre-training with this author context using the HuLM objective, as well as using it during fine-tuning with author context (textitHuFT:Human-aware Fine-Tuning). Empirical comparisons show that addressing the ecological fallacy during fine-tuning alone using QLoRA improves the performance of the larger 8B model over standard fine-tuning. Additionally, QLoRA-based continued HuLM pre-training results in a human-aware model generalizable for improved performance over eight downstream tasks with linear task classifier training alone. These results indicate the utility and importance of modeling language in the context of its original generators, the authors.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  3. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  4. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  5. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  6. 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
  7. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 641
  8. 2024Bridging Language and Items for Retrieval and Recommendation: Benchmarking LLMs as Semantic Encoderscited by 213
  9. 2013From Amateurs to Connoisseurs: Modeling the Evolution of User Expertise through Online Reviewscited by 107
  10. 2024Democratizing Large Language Models via Personalized Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuningcited by 87
  11. 2016Yelp Dataset Challenge: Review Rating Predictioncited by 84
  12. 2023Aligning Large Language Models with Human Preferences through Representation Engineeringcited by 71
7 more
  1. 2021UserIdentifier: Implicit User Representations for Simple and Effective Personalized Sentiment Analysiscited by 28
  2. 2019SemEval-2013 Task 2: Sentiment Analysis in Twittercited by 22
  3. 2022Empathetic Dialogue Generation via Sensitive Emotion Recognition and Sensible Knowledge Selectioncited by 19
  4. 2021MeLT: Message-Level Transformer with Masked Document Representations as Pre-Training for Stance Detectioncited by 11
  5. 2023Large Human Language Models: A Need and the Challengescited by 11
  6. 2024Comparing Pre-trained Human Language Models: Is it Better with Human Context as Groups, Individual Traits, or Both?cited by 4
  7. 2025Evaluation of LLMs-based Hidden States as Author Representations for Psychological Human-Centered NLP Taskscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.