CodeScout: Contextual Problem Statement Enhancement for Software Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Current AI-powered code assistance tools often struggle with poorly-defined problem statements that lack sufficient task context and requirements specification. Recent analysis of software engineering agents reveals that failures on such underspecified requests are highly correlated with longer trajectories involving either over-exploration or repeated attempts at applying the same fix without proper evolution or testing, leading to suboptimal outcomes across software development tasks. We introduce CodeScout, a contextual query refinement approach that systematically converts underspecified user requests into comprehensive, actionable problem statements through lightweight pre-exploration of the target codebase. Our key innovation is demonstrating that structured analysis before task execution can supplement existing agentic capabilities without requiring any modifications to their underlying scaffolds. CodeScout performs targeted context scoping, conducts multi-perspective analysis examining potential fixes and exploration opportunities, then synthesizes these insights into enhanced problem statements with reproduction steps, expected behaviors, and targeted exploration hints. This pre-exploration directly addresses the identified failure patterns by reducing non-converging agent trajectories while clarifying user intent in natural language space. We evaluate CodeScout using state-of-the-art agentic scaffolds and language models on SWEBench-Verified, demonstrating a 20% improvement in resolution rates with up to 27 additional issues resolved compared to the default baseline method. Our results suggest that systematic query refinement through contextual analysis represents a promising direction for enhancing AI code assistance capabilities.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.
Builds on
14 of 28 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Understanding Software Engineering Agents: A Study of Thought-Action-Result Trajectories23 Jun
- 2024An Empirical Study on LLM-based Agents for Automated Bug Fixing15 Nov
- 2024Large Language Model-Based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey4 Sep
- 2024RepairAgent: An Autonomous, LLM-Based Agent for Program Repair25 Mar
Other references · 10
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2022Grounded Copilot: How Programmers Interact with Code-Generating Modelscited by 216
- 2023InferFix: End-to-End Program Repair with LLMscited by 113
- 2022Productivity Assessment of Neural Code Completioncited by 97
- 2023Automatic Semantic Augmentation of Language Model Prompts (for Code Summarization)cited by 72
- 2024Code-Aware Prompting: A study of Coverage Guided Test Generation in Regression Setting using LLMcited by 63
- 2017Query Expansion Based on Crowd Knowledge for Code Searchcited by 18
- 2024You Augment Me: Exploring ChatGPT-based Data Augmentation for Semantic Code Searchcited by 11
- 2025Intuition to Evidence: Measuring AI's True Impact on Developer Productivitycited by 5
- 2025ARPaCCino: An Agentic-RAG for Policy as Code Compliancecited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026SWE-Explore: Benchmarking How Coding Agents Explore Repositoriescited by 20
- 2026From Question Answering to Task Completion: A Survey on Agent System and Harness Designcited by 9
- 2026REAgent: Requirement-Driven LLM Agents for Software Issue Resolutioncited by 4
- 2026Evaluating Agentic Code Repair Capabilities in Distributed Systemscited by 0
- 2026Evaluating Agentic Code Repair Capabilities in Distributed Systems14 Aug 2026
- 2026From Question Answering to Task Completion: A Survey on Agent System and Harness Design14 Jun 2026
- 2026SWE-Explore: Benchmarking How Coding Agents Explore Repositories5 Jun 2026
- 2026REAgent: Requirement-Driven LLM Agents for Software Issue Resolution8 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026ContextBench: A Benchmark for Context Retrieval in Coding Agents
- 2026SWE Context Bench: A Benchmark for Context Learning in Coding
- 2025Understanding Code Agent Behaviour: An Empirical Study of Success and Failure Trajectories
- 2026A Unified Issue Resolution Benchmark for Requirement Clarification, Planning, and Code Generation for Coding Agents
- 2025Agent READMEs: An Empirical Study of Context Files for Agentic Coding
- 2026The Limits of Long-Context Reasoning in Automated Bug Fixing
- 2026XAI for Coding Agent Failures: Transforming Raw Execution Traces into Actionable Insights
- 2025Beyond Final Code: A Process-Oriented Error Analysis of Software Development Agents in Real-World GitHub Scenarios