mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

X-RAY: Mapping LLM Reasoning Capability via Formalized and Calibrated Probes

arXiv 2603.05290 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) achieve promising performance, yet their ability to reason remains poorly understood. Existing evaluations largely emphasize task-level accuracy, often conflating pattern matching with reasoning capability. We present X-RAY, an explainable reasoning analysis system that maps the LLM reasoning capability using calibrated, formally verified probes. We model reasoning capability as a function of extractable textitstructure, operationalized through formal properties such as constraint interaction, reasoning depth, and solution-space geometry. X-Ray generates probes via formal tools with controlled structural variations, enabling precise isolation of incremental structural information through formal calibration and verification. We evaluate state-of-the-art LLMs on problems ranging from junior-level to advanced in mathematics, physics, and chemistry. Our analysis reveals a systematic asymmetry in LLM reasoning: models are relatively robust to constraint refinement, where additional conditions shrink an existing solution space, but degrade sharply under solution-space restructuring, where modifications alter the underlying structural form of the solution manifold. Moreover, calibrated formal probes differentiate models that appear indistinguishable on standard benchmarks and reveal failure modes that are structurally interpretable rather than opaque. Beyond evaluation, our framework is contamination-free and supports the training and testing of reasoning models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 27 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.

Builds on

27 of 44 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025How and Why LLMs Generalize: A Fine-Grained Analysis of LLM Reasoning from Cognitive Behaviors to Low-Level Patterns30 Dec
  2. 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report27 Dec
  3. 2023NPHardEval: Dynamic Benchmark on Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models via Complexity Classes22 Dec
  4. 2023DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning Tasks29 Sep
  5. 2022Impact of Pretraining Term Frequencies on Few-Shot Reasoning15 Feb

Other references · 22

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  6. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  7. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
  8. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,136
  9. 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
  10. 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 550
  11. 2023Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionalitycited by 503
  12. 2024LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM Benchmarkcited by 262
10 more
  1. 2023SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 256
  2. 2022Holistic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 131
  3. 2023ARB: Advanced Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 60
  4. 2024Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models by Meta Probing Agentscited by 54
  5. 2024MACM: Utilizing a Multi-Agent System for Condition Mining in Solving Complex Mathematical Problemscited by 41
  6. 2026From Entropy to Epiplexity: Rethinking Information for Computationally Bounded Intelligencecited by 41
  7. 2024Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 40
  8. 2024Achieving >97% on GSM8K: Deeply Understanding the Problems Makes LLMs Better Solvers for Math Word Problemscited by 31
  9. 2025LLLMs: A Data-Driven Survey of Evolving Research on Limitations of Large Language Modelscited by 9
  10. 2025Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Abilities of Large Reasoning Modelscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025LLMSR@XLLM25: An Empirical Study of LLM for Structural Reasoning
  2. 2025A Modular Dataset to Demonstrate LLM Abstraction Capability
  3. 2026The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes
  4. 2025Dissecting Logical Reasoning in LLMs: A Fine-Grained Evaluation and Supervision Study
  5. 2025FINEREASON: Evaluating and Improving LLMs' Deliberate Reasoning through Reflective Puzzle Solving
  6. 2026Unmasking Reasoning Processes: A Process-aware Benchmark for Evaluating Structural Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs
  7. 2026General365: Benchmarking General Reasoning in Large Language Models Across Diverse and Challenging Tasks
  8. 2026Beyond Surface Forms: Symbolic Edits as a Test for Logical Reasoning with LLMs