mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Adaptive Prototype-based Interpretable Grading of Prostate Cancer

arXiv 2603.04947 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prostate cancer being one of the frequently diagnosed malignancy in men, the rising demand for biopsies places a severe workload on pathologists. The grading procedure is tedious and subjective, motivating the development of automated systems. Although deep learning has made inroads in terms of performance, its limited interpretability poses challenges for widespread adoption in high-stake applications like medicine. Existing interpretability techniques for prostate cancer classifiers provide a coarse explanation but do not reveal why the highlighted regions matter. In this scenario, we propose a novel prototype-based weakly-supervised framework for an interpretable grading of prostate cancer from histopathology images. These networks can prove to be more trustworthy since their explicit reasoning procedure mirrors the workflow of a pathologist in comparing suspicious regions with clinically validated examples. The network is initially pre-trained at patch-level to learn robust prototypical features associated with each grade. In order to adapt it to a weakly-supervised setup for prostate cancer grading, the network is fine-tuned with a new prototype-aware loss function. Finally, a new attention-based dynamic pruning mechanism is introduced to handle inter-sample heterogeneity, while selectively emphasizing relevant prototypes for optimal performance. Extensive validation on the benchmark PANDA and SICAP datasets confirms that the framework can serve as a reliable assistive tool for pathologists in their routine diagnostic workflows.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.

Builds on

14 of 28 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,713
  2. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,426
  3. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,152
  4. 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,083
  5. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 735
  6. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 332
  7. 2021Interpretable Image Classification with Differentiable Prototypes Assignmentcited by 97
  8. 2021IAIA-BL: A Case-based Interpretable Deep Learning Model for Classification of Mass Lesions in Digital Mammographycited by 72
  9. 2021Going Deeper through the Gleason Scoring Scale: An Automatic end-to-end System for Histology Prostate Grading and Cribriform Pattern Detectioncited by 67
  10. 2022Multiple Instance Learning for Digital Pathology: A Review on the State-of-the-Art, Limitations & Future Potentialcited by 54
  11. 2022Towards Label-efficient Automatic Diagnosis and Analysis: A Comprehensive Survey of Advanced Deep Learning-based Weakly-supervised, Semi-supervised and Self-supervised Techniques in Histopathological Image Analysiscited by 29
  12. 2021Self-learning for weakly supervised Gleason grading of local patternscited by 14
2 more
  1. 2024Beyond accuracy: quantifying the reliability of Multiple Instance Learning for Whole Slide Image classificationcited by 1
  2. 2025Beyond Occlusion: In Search for Near Real-Time Explainability of CNN-Based Prostate Cancer Classificationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.