mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MOOSEnger: A Simulation-Aware AI Agent Framework for the MOOSE Ecosystem

arXiv 2603.04756 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2026cs.AI cs.CE cs.SEcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

MOOSEnger is a modeling and simulation AI agent framework for the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) ecosystem, built around a simulation-aware harness that combines an interchangeable reasoning model with grounded domain knowledge, revised simulation artifacts, MOOSE-specific validation, and executable solver feedback. This surrounding system addresses a central limitation of one-shot large language model generation: small syntax, schema, reference, or solver-configuration errors can prevent a plausible input from executing, while successful execution alone does not establish scientific correctness. MOOSEnger's simulation-aware harness integrates MOOSE knowledge retrieval, Hierarchical Input Text (HIT)-aware parsing, syntax metadata, language-server diagnostics, revision-controlled authoring, and local or MCP-backed validation and execution in a generate-check-repair-run workflow that binds evidence to each input revision and guides bounded repair before acceptance. Across 200 prompts spanning eight simulation families, the MOOSEnger harness increases executable success from 10/200 (5%) to 179/200 (89.5%) with GPT 5.2 API and from 0/200 to 153/200 (76.5%) with Gemma 4 31B. A complementary ten-case Method of Manufactured Solutions benchmark moves beyond executability: all ten generated inputs satisfy the semantic-alignment criterion, and eight execute successfully while meeting the prescribed single-mesh numerical-accuracy criterion. These results show that executable reliability depends on the complete agent system rather than on the reasoning model alone, and that simulation-aware harnessing provides a path toward physics-informed verification and future full application-level and engineering verification and validation implementation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 4 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.

Builds on

4 of 23 references.

References · 4

  1. 2024MetaOpenFOAM: an LLM-based multi-agent framework for CFDcited by 39
  2. 2025MooseAgent: A LLM Based Multi-agent Framework for Automating Moose Simulationcited by 16
  3. 2025Foam-Agent: A Large Language Model-Based Multi-Agent Framework for Automating Computational Fluid Dynamics Workflowscited by 9
  4. 2025ChatCFD: An LLM-Driven Agent for End-to-End CFD Automation with Structured Knowledge and Reasoningcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026VISA: A Structured Description Protocol for Agent-Based Simulation Models Towards Machine Reproducibility
  2. 2026OSWorld-Science: A Benchmark of Computer Use Agents for Learning and Using Scientific Software
  3. 2026ThunderAgent: A Simple, Fast and Program-Aware Agentic Inference System
  4. 2025State and Memory is All You Need for Robust and Reliable AI Agents
  5. 2026ORAgentBench: Can LLM Agents Solve Challenging Operations Research Tasks End to End?
  6. 2026ADK Arena: Evaluating Agent Development Kits via LLM-as-a-Developer
  7. 2025Curie: Toward Rigorous and Automated Scientific Experimentation with AI Agents
  8. 2026When Simulation Lies: A Sim-to-Real Benchmark and Domain-Randomized RL Recipe for Tool-Use Agents