How Professional Visual Artists are Negotiating Generative AI in the Workplace
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative AI has been heavily critiqued by artists in both popular media and HCI scholarship. However, more work is needed to understand the impacts of generative AI on professional artists' workplaces and careers. In this paper, we conduct a survey of 378 verified professional visual artists about how generative AI has impacted their careers and workplaces. We find (1) most visual artists are strongly opposed to using generative AI (text or visual) and negotiate their inclusion in the workplace through a variety of refusal strategies (2) there exist a range of factors in artists environments shaping their use of generative AI, including pressure from clients, bosses, and peers and (3) visual artists report overwhelmingly negative impacts of generative AI on their workplaces, leading to added stress and reduced job opportunities. In light of these findings, we encourage HCI researchers to contend more deeply with artists' desires not to use generative AI in the workplace.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2026.
Builds on
6 of 23 references.
References · 6
- 2023Glaze: Protecting Artists from Style Mimicry by Text-to-Image Modelscited by 200
- 2021LowKey: Leveraging Adversarial Attacks to Protect Social Media Users from Facial Recognitioncited by 92
- 2023Nightshade: Prompt-Specific Poisoning Attacks on Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 72
- 2020Data Leverage: A Framework for Empowering the Public in its Relationship with Technology Companiescited by 25
- 2024Foregrounding Artist Opinions: A Survey Study on Transparency, Ownership, and Fairness in AI Generative Artcited by 11
- 2025Un-Straightening Generative AI: How Queer Artists Surface and Challenge the Normativity of Generative AI Modelscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.