mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Projected Hessian Learning: Fast Curvature Supervision for Accurate Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials

arXiv 2603.04523 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2026physics.chem-ph cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Hessian matrix (second derivatives) encodes far richer local curvature of the potential energy surface than energies and forces alone. However, training machine-learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) with full Hessians is often impractical because explicitly forming and storing Hessian matrices scales quadratically in cost and memory. We introduce Projected Hessian Learning (PHL), a scalable second-order training framework that injects curvature information using only Hessian-vector products (HVPs). Rather than constructing the Hessian, PHL projects curvature along stochastic probe directions and uses an unbiased stochastic trace-based loss with favorable system-size scaling, enabling curvature-informed training without quadratic memory growth. We benchmark PHL on a chemically diverse dataset of reactants, products, transition states, intrinsic reaction coordinates, and normal-mode sampled geometries computed at omegaB97XD/6-31G(d). We compare energy-force training (E-F), two HVP-based schemes (E-F-HVP with one-hot or randomized probes), and full energy-force-Hessian training (E-F-H). With randomized probes per minibatch, both HVP schemes match full-Hessian training in energy, force, and Hessian accuracy while delivering >24x epoch speedups for the small molecular systems studied. In a fixed-probe regime with one HVP per molecule, randomized projections consistently outperform one-column probing, especially for far-from-equilibrium geometries. Overall, PHL replaces explicit Hessian supervision with force-complexity curvature training, retaining most second-order accuracy gains while scaling to larger, more complex molecular systems.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2026.

Builds on

14 of 47 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 846
  2. 2021E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Data-Efficient and Accurate Interatomic Potentialscited by 701
  3. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
  4. 2022MACE: Higher Order Equivariant Message Passing Neural Networks for Fast and Accurate Force Fieldscited by 467
  5. 2021Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular spectracited by 438
  6. 2014Sketching as a Tool for Numerical Linear Algebracited by 285
  7. 2017Deep Potential Molecular Dynamics: a scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanicscited by 213
  8. 2020Machine Learning Force Fieldscited by 204
  9. 2018Less is more: sampling chemical space with active learningcited by 80
  10. 2017Hierarchical modeling of molecular energies using a deep neural networkcited by 37
  11. 2025Towards Fast, Specialized Machine Learning Force Fields: Distilling Foundation Models via Energy Hessianscited by 15
  12. 2025HIP: Hessian Interatomic Potentials without derivativescited by 11
2 more
  1. 2024Hessian QM9: A quantum chemistry database of molecular Hessians in implicit solventscited by 7
  2. 2026PFT: Phonon Fine-tuning for Machine Learned Interatomic Potentialscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.