mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Slice-wise quality assessment of high b-value breast DWI via deep learning-based artifact detection

arXiv 2603.03941 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can support lesion detection and characterization in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), however especially high b-value diffusion-weighted acquisitions can be prone to intensity artifacts that can affect diagnostic image assessment. This study aims to detect both hyper- and hypointense artifacts on high b-value diffusion-weighted images (b=1500 s/mm2) using deep learning, employing either a binary classification (artifact presence) or a multiclass classification (artifact intensity) approach on a slice-wise dataset.This IRB-approved retrospective study used the single-center dataset comprising n=11806 slices from routine 3T breast MRI examinations performed between 2022 and mid-2023. Three convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures (DenseNet121, ResNet18, and SEResNet50) were trained for binary classification of hyper- and hypointense artifacts. The best performing model (DenseNet121) was applied to an independent holdout test set and was further trained separately for multiclass classification. Evaluation included area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under precision recall curve (AUPRC), precision, and recall, as well as analysis of predicted bounding box positions, derived from the network Grad-CAM heatmaps. DenseNet121 achieved AUROCs of 0.92 and 0.94 for hyper- and hypointense artifact detection, respectively, and weighted AUROCs of 0.85 and 0.88 for multiclass classification on single-slice high b-value diffusion-weighted images. A radiologist evaluated bounding box precision on a 1-5 Likert-like scale across 200 slices, achieving mean scores of 3.33+-1.04 for hyperintense artifacts and 2.62+-0.81 for hypointense artifacts. Hyper- and hypointense artifact detection in slice-wise breast DWI MRI dataset (b=1500 s/mm2) using CNNs particularly DenseNet121, seems promising and requires further validation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2026.

Builds on

10 of 33 references.

References · 10

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  6. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  7. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  8. 2015An Introduction to Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 510
  9. 2022MONAI: An open-source framework for deep learning in healthcarecited by 438
  10. 2018Model Evaluation, Model Selection, and Algorithm Selection in Machine Learningcited by 157

Built on by

Not cited yet.