AI4S-SDS: A Neuro-Symbolic Solvent Design System via Sparse MCTS and Differentiable Physics Alignment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automated design of chemical formulations is a cornerstone of materials science, yet it requires navigating a high-dimensional combinatorial space involving discrete compositional choices and continuous geometric constraints. Existing Large Language Model (LLM) agents face significant challenges in this setting, including context window limitations during long-horizon reasoning and path-dependent exploration that may lead to mode collapse. To address these issues, we introduce AI4S-SDS, a closed-loop neuro-symbolic framework that integrates multi-agent collaboration with a tailored Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) engine. We propose a Sparse State Storage mechanism with Dynamic Path Reconstruction, which decouples reasoning history from context length and enables arbitrarily deep exploration under fixed token budgets. To reduce local convergence and improve coverage, we implement a Global--Local Search Strategy: a memory-driven planning module adaptively reconfigures the search root based on historical feedback, while a Sibling-Aware Expansion mechanism promotes orthogonal exploration at the node level. Furthermore, we bridge symbolic reasoning and physical feasibility through a Differentiable Physics Engine, employing a hybrid normalized loss with sparsity-inducing regularization to optimize continuous mixing ratios under thermodynamic constraints. Empirical results show that AI4S-SDS achieves full validity under the adopted HSP-based physical constraints and substantially improves exploration diversity compared to baseline agents. In preliminary lithography experiments, the framework identifies a novel photoresist developer formulation that demonstrates competitive or superior performance relative to a commercial benchmark, highlighting the potential of diversity-driven neuro-symbolic search for scientific discovery.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2026.
Builds on
10 of 16 references.
References · 10
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
- 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
- 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 864
- 2016Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of moleculescited by 765
- 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 744
- 2017Molecular De Novo Design through Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 267
- 2017Learning to Plan Chemical Synthesescited by 179
- 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning for De-Novo Drug Designcited by 161
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Graph-Native Reinforcement Learning Enables Traceable Scientific Hypothesis Generation through Conceptual Recombination
- 2023Monte Carlo Thought Search: Large Language Model Querying for Complex Scientific Reasoning in Catalyst Design
- 2025Agentic Mixture-of-Workflows for Multi-Modal Chemical Search
- 2025Hierarchical Multi-agent Large Language Model Reasoning for Autonomous Functional Materials Discovery
- 2024Leveraging Chemistry Foundation Models to Facilitate Structure Focused Retrieval Augmented Generation in Multi-Agent Workflows for Catalyst and Materials Design
- 2025MiST: Understanding the Role of Mid-Stage Scientific Training in Developing Chemical Reasoning Models
- 2024ChemReasoner: Heuristic Search over a Large Language Model's Knowledge Space using Quantum-Chemical Feedback
- 2026RetroAgent: Harnessing LLMs to Search Over Structured Memory for Agentic Retrosynthesis Planning