Controllable Generative Sandbox for Causal Inference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Method validation and study design in causal inference rely on synthetic data with known counterfactuals. Existing simulators trade off distributional realism, the ability to capture mixed-type and multimodal tabular data, against causal controllability, including explicit control over overlap, unmeasured confounding, and treatment effect heterogeneity. We introduce CausalMix, a variational generative framework that closes this gap by coupling a mixture of Gaussian latent priors with data-type-specific decoders for continuous, binary, and categorical variables. The model incorporates explicit causal controls: an overlap regularizer shaping propensity-score distributions, alongside direct parameterizations of confounding strength and effect heterogeneity. This unified objective preserves fidelity to the observed data while enabling factorial manipulation of causal mechanisms, allowing overlap, confounding strength, and treatment effect heterogeneity to be varied independently at design time. Across benchmarks, CausalMix achieves state-of-the-art distributional metrics on mixed-type tables while providing stable, fine-grained causal control. We demonstrate practical utility in a comparative safety study of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatments, using CausalMix to compare estimators under calibrated data-generating processes, tune hyperparameters, and conduct simulation-based power analyses under targeted treatment effect heterogeneity scenarios.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.
Builds on
22 of 47 references.
References · 22
- 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 475
- 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 309
- 2016Revisiting Classifier Two-Sample Testscited by 258
- 2019Orthogonal Statistical Learningcited by 150
- 2017Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: Lessons learned from a data analysis competitioncited by 106
- 2020Synthetic Data -- Anonymisation Groundhog Daycited by 105
- 2021Discussion on "Bayesian Regression Tree Models for Causal Inference: Regularization, Confounding, and Heterogeneous Effects" by Hahn, Murray and Carvalhocited by 77
- 2021On Inductive Biases for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 74
- 2020RealCause: Realistic Causal Inference Benchmarkingcited by 44
- 2018Benchmarking Framework for Performance-Evaluation of Causal Inference Analysiscited by 33
- 2019Using Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks for the Design of Monte Carlo Simulationscited by 32
- 2022Empirical Analysis of Model Selection for Heterogeneous Causal Effect Estimationcited by 25
10 more
- 2019Atlantic Causal Inference Conference (ACIC) Data Analysis Challenge 2017cited by 23
- 2022Validating Causal Inference Methodscited by 20
- 2024An improved tabular data generator with VAE-GMM integrationcited by 13
- 2022On the role of benchmarking data sets and simulations in method comparison studiescited by 7
- 2025Synthetic Data Privacy Metricscited by 7
- 2023Flexible Nonparametric Inference for Causal Effects under the Front-Door Modelcited by 3
- 2024Average Causal Effect Estimation in DAGs with Hidden Variables: Beyond Back-Door and Front-Door Criteriacited by 3
- 2025Causal Inference with the Napkin Graphcited by 3
- 2025Frugal, Flexible, Faithful: Causal Data Simulation via Frengressioncited by 2
- 2025A cautionary note for plasmode simulation studies in the setting of causal inferencecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.