Transport Clustering: Solving Low-Rank Optimal Transport via Clustering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Optimal transport (OT) finds a least cost transport plan between two probability distributions using a cost matrix defined on pairs of points. Unlike standard OT, which infers unstructured pointwise mappings, low-rank optimal transport explicitly constrains the rank of the transport plan to infer latent structure. This improves statistical stability and robustness, yields sharper parametric rates for estimating Wasserstein distances adaptive to the intrinsic rank, and generalizes K-means to co-clustering. These advantages, however, come at the cost of a non-convex and NP-hard optimization problem. We introduce transport clustering, an algorithm to compute a low-rank OT plan that reduces low-rank OT to a clustering problem on correspondences obtained from a full-rank textittransport registration step. We prove that this reduction yields polynomial-time, constant-factor approximation algorithms for low-rank OT: specifically, a (1+γ) approximation for negative-type metrics and a (1+γ+√2γ,) approximation for kernel costs, where γ ∈ [0,1] denotes the approximation ratio of the optimal full-rank solution relative to the low-rank optimal. Empirically, transport clustering outperforms existing low-rank OT solvers on synthetic benchmarks and large-scale, high-dimensional datasets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.
Builds on
23 of 59 references.
References · 23
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
- 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transportcited by 835
- 2020Sparse Sinkhorn Attentioncited by 250
- 2023A mathematical perspective on Transformerscited by 160
- 2021Sinkformers: Transformers with Doubly Stochastic Attentioncited by 136
- 2022Neural Optimal Transportcited by 123
- 2016Relatively-Smooth Convex Optimization by First-Order Methods, and Applicationscited by 108
- 2021Do Neural Optimal Transport Solvers Work? A Continuous Wasserstein-2 Benchmarkcited by 95
- 2021Low-Rank Sinkhorn Factorizationcited by 66
- 2021Linear-Time Gromov Wasserstein Distances using Low Rank Couplings and Costscited by 61
- 2024Schr"odinger Bridge Flow for Unpaired Data Translationcited by 47
11 more
- 2024Statistical optimal transportcited by 44
- 2018Statistical Optimal Transport via Factored Couplingscited by 38
- 2024Distributional Preference Alignment of LLMs via Optimal Transportcited by 26
- 2022Low-rank Optimal Transport: Approximation, Statistics and Debiasingcited by 21
- 2020Making transport more robust and interpretable by moving data through a small number of anchor pointscited by 18
- 2020Linear Time Sinkhorn Divergences using Positive Featurescited by 17
- 2023Statistically Optimal K-means Clustering via Nonnegative Low-rank Semidefinite Programmingcited by 9
- 2025Hierarchical Refinement: Optimal Transport to Infinity and Beyondcited by 8
- 2024Low-Rank Optimal Transport through Factor Relaxation with Latent Couplingcited by 7
- 2022Sketch-and-Lift: Scalable Subsampled Semidefinite Program for K-means Clusteringcited by 6
- 2022Background Modeling for Double Higgs Boson Production: Density Ratios and Optimal Transportcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.