Old Habits Die Hard: How Conversational History Geometrically Traps LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
How does the conversational past of large language models (LLMs) influence their future performance? Recent work suggests that LLMs are affected by their conversational history in unexpected ways. For instance, hallucinations in prior interactions may influence subsequent model responses. In this work, we introduce History-Echoes, a framework that investigates how conversational history biases subsequent generations. The framework explores this bias from two perspectives: probabilistically, we model conversations as Markov chains to quantify state consistency; geometrically, we measure the consistency of consecutive hidden representations. Across three model families and six datasets spanning diverse phenomena, our analysis reveals a strong correlation between the two perspectives. By bridging these perspectives, we demonstrate that behavioral persistence manifests as a geometric trap, where gaps in the latent space confine the model's trajectory. Code available at https://github.com/technion-cs-nlp/OldHabitsDieHard.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2026.
Builds on
32 of 44 references.
References · 32
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
- 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,184
- 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 988
- 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
20 more
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 960
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 644
- 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deepcited by 450
- 2023How Language Model Hallucinations Can Snowballcited by 310
- 2024Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Schemingcited by 252
- 2024SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusalcited by 224
- 2023LoRA Fine-tuning Efficiently Undoes Safety Training in Llama 2-Chat 70Bcited by 183
- 2024The Remarkable Robustness of LLMs: Stages of Inference?cited by 138
- 2020Similarity Analysis of Contextual Word Representation Modelscited by 54
- 2024Large Language Models as Markov Chainscited by 33
- 2025The LLM Already Knows: Estimating LLM-Perceived Question Difficulty via Hidden Representationscited by 26
- 2025Belief Dynamics Reveal the Dual Nature of In-Context Learning and Activation Steeringcited by 24
- 2026Sycophancy Hides Linearly in the Attention Headscited by 21
- 2024Markov Chain of Thought for Efficient Mathematical Reasoningcited by 19
- 2026Agentic Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 16
- 2024Layer by Layer: Uncovering Where Multi-Task Learning Happens in Instruction-Tuned Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2024Distinguishing Ignorance from Error in LLM Hallucinationscited by 14
- 2025HACK: Hallucinations Along Certainty and Knowledge Axescited by 6
- 2026Contextual Drag: How Errors in the Context Affect LLM Reasoningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026SWAY: A Counterfactual Computational Linguistic Approach to Measuring and Mitigating Sycophancycited by 6
- 2026Most LLM Conformity Needs No Speaker: Measuring the Speaker-Free Floor in Peer-Pressure Benchmarkscited by 4
- 2026Recalling Too Well: Sycophancy Evaluation and Mitigation in Memory-Augmented Modelscited by 3
- 2026AMEL: Accumulated Message Effects on LLM Judgmentscited by 1
- 2026Topics as Proxies for Sociodemographics: How Conversational Context Affects LLM Answerscited by 1
- 2026Most LLM Conformity Needs No Speaker: Measuring the Speaker-Free Floor in Peer-Pressure Benchmarks6 Jul 2026
- 2026Recalling Too Well: Sycophancy Evaluation and Mitigation in Memory-Augmented Models9 Jun 2026
- 2026Topics as Proxies for Sociodemographics: How Conversational Context Affects LLM Answers1 Jun 2026
- 2026AMEL: Accumulated Message Effects on LLM Judgments21 May 2026
- 2026SWAY: A Counterfactual Computational Linguistic Approach to Measuring and Mitigating Sycophancy2 Apr 2026