Less Noise, Same Certificate: Retain Sensitivity for Unlearning
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
Certified machine unlearning aims to provably remove the influence of a deletion set U from a model trained on a dataset S, by producing an unlearned output that is statistically indistinguishable from retraining on the retain set R:=Ssetminus U. Many existing certified unlearning methods adapt techniques from Differential Privacy (DP) and add noise calibrated to global sensitivity, i.e., the worst-case output change over all adjacent datasets. We show that this DP-style calibration is often overly conservative for unlearning, based on a key observation: certified unlearning, by definition, does not require protecting the privacy of the retained data R. Motivated by this distinction, we define retain sensitivity as the worst-case output change over deletions U while keeping R fixed. While insufficient for DP, retain sensitivity is exactly sufficient for unlearning, allowing for the same certificates with less noise. We validate these reductions in noise theoretically and empirically across several problems, including the weight of minimum spanning trees, PCA, and ERM. Finally, we refine the analysis of two widely used certified unlearning algorithms through the lens of retain sensitivity, leveraging the regularity induced by R to further reduce noise and improve utility.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 27 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.
Builds on
27 of 51 references.
Closest ancestors · 15
Same direction, newest first
- 2025The Space Complexity of Learning-Unlearning Algorithms16 Jun
- 2025Online Learning and Unlearning13 May
- 2024The Utility and Complexity of in- and out-of-Distribution Machine Unlearning12 Dec
- 2024Rewind-to-Delete: Certified Machine Unlearning for Nonconvex Functions15 Sep
- 2024Towards Certified Unlearning for Deep Neural Networks1 Aug
- 2024Towards Scalable Exact Machine Unlearning Using Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning24 Jun
- 2024Avoiding Copyright Infringement via Large Language Model Unlearning16 Jun
- 2024Reconstruction Attacks on Machine Unlearning: Simple Models are Vulnerable30 May
- 2024Langevin Unlearning: A New Perspective of Noisy Gradient Descent for Machine Unlearning18 Jan
- 2023Tight Bounds for Machine Unlearning via Differential Privacy2 Sep
- 2023Fast Machine Unlearning Without Retraining Through Selective Synaptic Dampening15 Aug
- 2022Forget Unlearning: Towards True Data-Deletion in Machine Learning17 Oct
3 more
Other references · 12
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
- 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
- 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
- 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 339
- 2020Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearningcited by 303
- 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 216
- 2020When Machine Unlearning Jeopardizes Privacycited by 181
- 2024Potion: Towards Poison Unlearningcited by 14
- 2025An Iterative Algorithm for Differentially Private k-PCA with Adaptive Noisecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Why Forget-Only Unlearning Needs Memorizationcited by 0
- 2026Why Forget-Only Unlearning Needs Memorization7 Oct 2026