mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BRIGHT: A Collaborative Generalist-Specialist Foundation Model for Breast Pathology

arXiv 2603.03030 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generalist pathology foundation models (PFMs), pretrained on large-scale multi-organ datasets, have demonstrated remarkable predictive capabilities across diverse clinical applications. However, their proficiency on the full spectrum of clinically essential tasks within a specific organ system remains an open question due to the lack of large-scale validation cohorts for a single organ as well as the absence of a tailored training paradigm that can effectively translate broad histomorphological knowledge into the organ-specific expertise required for specialist-level interpretation. In this study, we propose BRIGHT, the first PFM specifically designed for breast pathology, trained on over 51,000 breast whole-slide images derived from a cohort of over 40,000 patients across 19 hospitals. BRIGHT employs a collaborative generalist-specialist framework to capture both universal and organ-specific features. To comprehensively evaluate the performance of PFMs on breast oncology, we curate the largest multi-institutional cohorts to date for downstream task development and evaluation, comprising over 25,000 WSIs across 10 hospitals. The validation cohorts cover the full spectrum of breast pathology across 25 distinct clinical tasks spanning diagnosis, biomarker prediction, treatment response and survival prediction. Extensive experiments demonstrate that BRIGHT outperforms five leading generalist PFMs, achieving state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in 25 of 25 internal validation tasks and in 4 of 11 external validation tasks with excellent heatmap interpretability. By evaluating on large-scale validation cohorts, this study not only demonstrates BRIGHT's clinical utility in breast oncology but also validates a collaborative generalist-specialist paradigm, providing a scalable template for developing PFMs on a specific organ system, accelerating the translation of foundation models into ...

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.

Builds on

14 of 43 references.

References · 14

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  4. 2020Data Efficient and Weakly Supervised Computational Pathology on Whole Slide Imagescited by 745
  5. 2020PathVQA: 30000+ Questions for Medical Visual Question Answeringcited by 475
  6. 2024Virchow2: Scaling Self-Supervised Mixed Magnification Models in Pathologycited by 161
  7. 2021BRACS: A Dataset for BReAst Carcinoma Subtyping in H&E Histology Imagescited by 132
  8. 2020Deep Learning-based Computational Pathology Predicts Origins for Cancers of Unknown Primarycited by 89
  9. 2024A Clinical Benchmark of Public Self-Supervised Pathology Foundation Modelscited by 66
  10. 2024A Multimodal Knowledge-enhanced Whole-slide Pathology Foundation Modelcited by 59
  11. 2024A Multimodal Vision Foundation Model for Clinical Dermatologycited by 50
  12. 2024Benchmarking foundation models as feature extractors for weakly-supervised computational pathologycited by 49
2 more
  1. 2025PathBench: A comprehensive comparison benchmark for pathology foundation models towards precision oncologycited by 24
  2. 2025A Survey of Pathology Foundation Model: Progress and Future Directionscited by 16

Built on by

Not cited yet.