SAE as a Crystal Ball: Interpretable Features Predict Cross-domain Transferability of LLMs without Training
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, pre-trained large language models have achieved remarkable success across diverse tasks. Besides the pivotal role of self-supervised pre-training, their effectiveness in downstream applications also depends critically on the post-training process, which adapts models to task-specific data and objectives. However, this process inevitably introduces model shifts that can influence performance in different domains, and how such shifts transfer remains poorly understood. To open up the black box, we propose the SAE-based Transferability Score (STS), a new metric that leverages sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to forecast post-training transferability. Taking supervised fine-tuning as an example, STS identifies shifted dimensions in SAE representations and calculates their correlations with downstream domains, enabling reliable estimation of transferability textitbefore fine-tuning. Extensive experiments across multiple models and domains show that STS accurately predicts the transferability of supervised fine-tuning, achieving Pearson correlation coefficients above 0.7 with actual performance changes. Beyond this, we take an initial step toward extending STS to reinforcement learning. We believe that STS can serve as an colorblack interpretable tool for guiding post-training strategies in LLMs. Code is available at https://github.com/PKU-ML/STS.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 31 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.
Builds on
31 of 34 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted Remedy19 Jun
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders6 Jun
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models15 Sep
Other references · 28
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,810
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
16 more
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
- 2023WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-Instructcited by 733
- 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 672
- 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 498
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
- 2023How Abilities in Large Language Models are Affected by Supervised Fine-tuning Data Compositioncited by 223
- 2023Few-shot Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning: A Fair Comparison and Evaluationcited by 136
- 2025Does Math Reasoning Improve General LLM Capabilities? Understanding Transferability of LLM Reasoningcited by 106
- 2023Cumulative Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 94
- 2023In-Context Learning Learns Label Relationships but Is Not Conventional Learningcited by 51
- 2025OMEGA: Can LLMs Reason Outside the Box in Math? Evaluating Exploratory, Compositional, and Transformative Generalizationcited by 50
- 2024Can In-context Learning Really Generalize to Out-of-distribution Tasks?cited by 23
- 2025Are Smarter LLMs Safer? Exploring Safety-Reasoning Trade-offs in Prompting and Fine-Tuningcited by 20
- 2024Beyond Interpretability: The Gains of Feature Monosemanticity on Model Robustnesscited by 13
- 2023Investigating the Learning Behaviour of In-context Learning: A Comparison with Supervised Learningcited by 11
- 2025LANPO: Bootstrapping Language and Numerical Feedback for Reinforcement Learning in LLMscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026What Does an LLM Learn from Reinforcement Learning? A Mechanistic Interpretability Perspective with Fixed-SAE Track
- 2026Guiding LLM Post-training Data Engineering with Model Internals from Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025Teach Old SAEs New Domain Tricks with Boosting
- 2024Tracking the Feature Dynamics in LLM Training: A Mechanistic Study
- 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Models
- 2025Does higher interpretability imply better utility? A Pairwise Analysis on Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretability
- 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Models