PRISM: Pushing the Frontier of Deep Think via Process Reward Model-Guided Inference
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
DEEPTHINK methods improve reasoning by generating, refining, and aggregating populations of candidate solutions, which enables strong performance on complex mathematical and scientific tasks. However, existing frameworks often lack reliable correctness signals during inference, which creates a population-enhancement bottleneck where deeper deliberation amplifies errors, suppresses correct minority solutions, and yields weak returns to additional compute. In this paper, we introduce a functional decomposition of DEEPTHINK systems and propose PRISM, a Process Reward Model (PRM)-guided inference algorithm that uses step-level verification to guide both population refinement and solution aggregation. During refinement, PRISM treats candidate solutions as particles in a PRM-defined energy landscape and reshapes the population through score-guided resampling and stochastic refinement, which concentrates probability mass on higher-quality reasoning while preserving diversity. Across mathematics and science benchmarks, PRISM is competitive with or outperforms existing DEEPTHINK methods, reaching 90.0%, 75.4%, and 71.4% with gpt-oss-20b on AIME25, HMMT25, and GPQA Diamond, respectively, while matching or exceeding gpt-oss-120b. Additionally, our analysis shows that PRISM produces consistent net-directional correction during refinement, remains reliable when the initial population contains few correct candidates, and often lies on the compute-accuracy Pareto frontier.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 21 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.
Builds on
21 of 26 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations14 Dec
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
Other references · 19
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,311
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
- 2023Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Modelscited by 551
- 2024Inference Scaling Laws: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal Inference for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 282
- 2025MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitionscited by 275
- 2025Deep Think with Confidencecited by 199
- 2023Self-Evaluation Guided Beam Search for Reasoningcited by 195
7 more
- 2023Planning with Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 179
- 2025Verbalized Sampling: How to Mitigate Mode Collapse and Unlock LLM Diversitycited by 100
- 2025Debate or Vote: Which Yields Better Decisions in Multi-Agent Large Language Models?cited by 74
- 2025Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Conflicting Evidencecited by 60
- 2025SciMaster: Towards General-Purpose Scientific AI Agents, Part I. X-Master as Foundation: Can We Lead on Humanity's Last Exam?cited by 45
- 2025Recursive Self-Aggregation Unlocks Deep Thinking in Large Language Modelscited by 30
- 2025Generalized Parallel Scaling with Interdependent Generationscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Reasoning over mathematical objects: on-policy reward modeling and test time aggregationcited by 3
- 2026Shattering the Autoregressive Curse: Dynamic Epistemic Entropy Orchestrated Erasable Reinforcement Learning for LLMscited by 0
- 2026Reasoning Jury: Multi-Model Consensus for Evaluating Reasoning Tracescited by 0
- 2026Reasoning Jury: Multi-Model Consensus for Evaluating Reasoning Traces12 Aug 2026
- 2026Shattering the Autoregressive Curse: Dynamic Epistemic Entropy Orchestrated Erasable Reinforcement Learning for LLMs16 Jun 2026
- 2026Reasoning over mathematical objects: on-policy reward modeling and test time aggregation19 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026SCI-PRM: A Tool Aware Process Reward Model for Scientific Reasoning Verification
- 2025ScalePRM: Training Process Reward Models by Scaling Verification Compute Without Ground Truth
- 2026TRIM: Hybrid Inference via Targeted Stepwise Routing in Multi-Step Reasoning Tasks
- 2026The Hidden Bias of Process Reward Models:PRISM for Rewarding the Right Reasoning
- 2023Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoning
- 2025Accelerating LLM Reasoning via Early Rejection with Partial Reward Modeling
- 2026The Quality-Utility Paradox: Why High-Reward Data Impairs Small Model Mathematical Reasoning
- 2026Know Thy Reasoner: Not All Language Models Explore Alike