Manifold Aware Denoising Score Matching (MAD)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A major focus in designing methods for learning distributions defined on manifolds is to alleviate the need to implicitly learn the manifold so that learning can concentrate on the data distribution within the manifold. However, accomplishing this often leads to compute-intensive solutions. In this work, we propose a simple modification to denoising score-matching in the ambient space to implicitly account for the manifold, thereby reducing the burden of learning the manifold while maintaining computational efficiency. Specifically, we propose a simple decomposition of the score function into a known component sbase and a remainder component s-sbase (the learning target), with the former implicitly including information on where the data manifold resides. We derive known components sbase in analytical form for several important cases, including distributions over rotation matrices and discrete distributions, and use them to demonstrate the utility of this approach in those cases.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2026.
Builds on
28 of 41 references.
References · 28
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
- 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,101
- 2022Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Modelscited by 3,045
- 2024Simplified and Generalized Masked Diffusion for Discrete Datacited by 626
- 2023Flow Matching on General Geometriescited by 265
- 2022Riemannian Score-Based Generative Modellingcited by 219
- 2020Riemannian Continuous Normalizing Flowscited by 145
- 2022Riemannian Diffusion Modelscited by 122
- 2020Flows for simultaneous manifold learning and density estimationcited by 118
- 2020Neural Manifold Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 81
- 2016Normalizing Flows on Riemannian Manifoldscited by 68
16 more
- 2021Moser Flow: Divergence-based Generative Modeling on Manifoldscited by 67
- 2021Implicit-PDF: Non-Parametric Representation of Probability Distributions on the Rotation Manifoldcited by 65
- 2022Matching Normalizing Flows and Probability Paths on Manifoldscited by 57
- 2017Machine Learning for the Geosciences: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 53
- 2024Deep Generative Models through the Lens of the Manifold Hypothesis: A Survey and New Connectionscited by 47
- 2025Theoretical Benefit and Limitation of Diffusion Language Modelcited by 47
- 2020Deep Bingham Networks: Dealing with Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Pose Estimationcited by 43
- 2020Neural Ordinary Differential Equations on Manifoldscited by 31
- 2025Why Masking Diffusion Works: Condition on the Jump Schedule for Improved Discrete Diffusioncited by 15
- 2023Delving into Discrete Normalizing Flows on SO(3) Manifold for Probabilistic Rotation Modelingcited by 14
- 2025When Scores Learn Geometry: Rate Separations under the Manifold Hypothesiscited by 14
- 2021Density estimation on smooth manifolds with normalizing flowscited by 11
- 2023Learning Distributions on Manifolds with Free-Form Flowscited by 7
- 2018Directional grid maps: modeling multimodal angular uncertainty in dynamic environmentscited by 5
- 2024Latent Diffusion Models for Controllable RNA Sequence Generationcited by 4
- 2025Quantization Of Probability Measures In Maximum~Mean~Discrepancy Distancecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.