A Benchmark Analysis of Graph and Non-Graph Methods for Caenorhabditis Elegans Neuron Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study establishes a benchmark for Caenorhabditis elegans neuron classification, comparing four graph methods (GCN, GraphSAGE, GAT, GraphTransformer) against four non-graph methods (Logistic Regression, MLP, LOLCAT, NeuPRINT). Using the functional connectome, we classified Sensory, Interneuron, and Motor neurons based on Spatial, Connection, and Neuronal Activity features. Results show that attention-based GNNs significantly outperform baselines on the Spatial and Connection features. The Neuronal Activity features yielded poor performance, likely due to the low temporal resolution of the underlying neuronal activity data. Our benchmark validates the use of GNNs and highlights that Spatial and Connection features are key predictors for Caenorhabditis elegans neuron classes. Code is available at: https://github.com/JingqiLuu/neuronclf-gnn-benchmark.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2026.
Builds on
7 of 20 references.
References · 7
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2022BrainGB: A Benchmark for Brain Network Analysis with Graph Neural Networkscited by 73
- 2023Learning Time-Invariant Representations for Individual Neurons from Population Dynamicscited by 8
- 2025Rethinking Functional Brain Connectome Analysis: Do Graph Deep Learning Models Helpcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.