mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Scaling Laws of SignSGD in Linear Regression: When Does It Outperform SGD?

arXiv 2603.02069 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AI math.OCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study scaling laws of signSGD under a power-law random features (PLRF) model that accounts for both feature and target decay. We analyze the population risk of a linear model trained with one-pass signSGD on Gaussian-sketched features. We express the risk as a function of model size, training steps, learning rate, and the feature and target decay parameters. Comparing against the SGD risk analyzed by Paquette et al. (2024), we identify a drift-normalization effect and a noise-reshaping effect unique to signSGD. We then obtain compute-optimal scaling laws under the optimal choice of learning rate. Our analysis shows that the noise-reshaping effect can make the compute-optimal slope of signSGD steeper than that of SGD in regimes where noise is dominant. Finally, we observe that the widely used warmup-stable-decay (WSD) schedule further reduces the noise term and sharpens the compute-optimal slope, when feature decay is fast but target decay is slow.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2026.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.