mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CoVe: Training Interactive Tool-Use Agents via Constraint-Guided Verification

arXiv 2603.01940 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2026cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Developing multi-turn interactive tool-use agents is challenging because real-world user needs are often complex and ambiguous, yet agents must execute deterministic actions to satisfy them. To address this gap, we introduce CoVe (Constraint-Verification), a post-training data synthesis framework designed for training interactive tool-use agents while ensuring both data complexity and correctness. CoVe begins by defining explicit task constraints, which serve a dual role: they guide the generation of complex trajectories and act as deterministic verifiers for assessing trajectory quality. This enables the creation of high-quality training trajectories for supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and the derivation of accurate reward signals for reinforcement learning (RL). Our evaluation on the challenging τ2-bench benchmark demonstrates the effectiveness of the framework. Notably, our compact CoVe-4B model achieves success rates of 43.0% and 59.4% in the Airline and Retail domains, respectively; its overall performance significantly outperforms strong baselines of similar scale and remains competitive with models up to 17× its size. These results indicate that CoVe provides an effective and efficient pathway for synthesizing training data for state-of-the-art interactive tool-use agents. To support future research, we open-source our code, trained model, and the full set of 12K high-quality trajectories used for training.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2026.

Builds on

24 of 25 references.

References · 24

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  4. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  5. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  6. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
  7. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
  8. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
  9. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
  10. 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,107
  11. 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 755
  12. 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 558
12 more
  1. 2025Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligencecited by 523
  2. 2024Mobile-Agent: Autonomous Multi-Modal Mobile Device Agent with Visual Perceptioncited by 283
  3. 2024CodeAgent: Enhancing Code Generation with Tool-Integrated Agent Systems for Real-World Repo-level Coding Challengescited by 278
  4. 2022TALM: Tool Augmented Language Modelscited by 197
  5. 2025APIGen-MT: Agentic Pipeline for Multi-Turn Data Generation via Simulated Agent-Human Interplaycited by 158
  6. 2025Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmapcited by 122
  7. 2024GUI Agents: A Surveycited by 101
  8. 2025Tongyi DeepResearch Technical Reportcited by 53
  9. 2025Simulating Environments with Reasoning Models for Agent Trainingcited by 52
  10. 2025MUA-RL: Multi-turn User-interacting Agent Reinforcement Learning for agentic tool usecited by 30
  11. 2026Unlocking Implicit Experience: Synthesizing Tool-Use Trajectories from Textcited by 13
  12. 2025KG-RAG: Enhancing GUI Agent Decision-Making via Knowledge Graph-Driven Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.