Changes in Manuscript Length, Research Team Size, and International Collaboration in the Post-2022 Period: Evidence from PLOS ONE
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have diffused rapidly into academic writing since late 2022. Using the complete population of 109,393 research articles published in textitPLOS ONE between 2019 and 2025, we examine population-level structural publication indicators, including full-text manuscript length, authorship team size, reference volume, and cross-linguistic collaboration, before and after 2022. textitPLOS ONE's multidisciplinary scope and consistent editorial framework allow cross-field comparison under uniform conditions over an extended period. Manuscript length increased substantially, with gains ranging from 14.8% among African-affiliated authors and 11.7% among Asian-affiliated authors to 5.3% among native English-speaking (NES) authors, cutting the word-count gap by 39%. More strikingly, non-native English-speaking (NNES) authors reduced both authorship team size, from 6.54 to 6.06 authors, or 7.3%, and collaboration with NES co-authors, from 17.8% to 12.2%, or 36%, while NES authors remained stable in both team size and collaboration rates. Reference counts increased modestly and uniformly across groups. These findings suggest that post-2022 tools may be reshaping not only how science is written, but who writes it together.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.