mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Curvature-Weighted Capacity Allocation: A Minimum Description Length Framework for Layer-Adaptive Large Language Model Optimization

arXiv 2603.00910 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2026cs.IT cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Layer-wise capacity in large language models is highly non-uniform: some layers contribute disproportionately to loss reduction, whereas others are nearly redundant. Existing layer-scoring methods provide sensitivity estimates but do not give a principled rule for converting those estimates into allocation or pruning decisions under a global hardware budget. We introduce a curvature-aware, MDL-inspired framework built around the layer gain zetak2=gk^topwidetilde Hkk-1gk. This quantity equals twice the maximal decrease predicted by the regularized layer-restricted quadratic model and incorporates inverse local curvature; it is therefore a local surrogate for reducible risk, not a universal dominance claim over gradient-norm scores. After normalizing the gains into scores qk, we formulate two convex programs: one allocates expert slots under diminishing returns, and the other assigns layer-wise pruning ratios while protecting high-score layers. Both continuous programs have unique globally optimal solutions characterized by one dual variable and computable in O(Klog(1/varepsilon)) time by bisection. We also prove a quadratic transfer-regret bound: when source and target score vectors differ by at most δ, the target surrogate cost of the transferred decision is within O(δ2) of the target optimum. Experiments on Mistral-7B and Gemma-7B show clear allocation gains in some settings and competitive, though mixed, pruning performance. The framework therefore replaces an empirical score-to-decision heuristic with a budget-feasible optimization procedure whose guarantees apply to the stated continuous surrogates. Code is available on github repo - [TKAI-LAB-Mali/Curvature-Weighted-Capacity-Allocation](https://github.com/TKAI-LAB-Mali/Curvature-Weighted-Capacity-Allocation.git)

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2026.

Builds on

32 of 44 references.

References · 32

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  3. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  4. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  5. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  6. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
  7. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  8. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  9. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  10. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  11. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
  12. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
20 more
  1. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  2. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  3. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,090
  4. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
  5. 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 776
  6. 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 776
  7. 2017Practical Gauss-Newton Optimisation for Deep Learningcited by 139
  8. 2023DataInf: Efficiently Estimating Data Influence in LoRA-tuned LLMs and Diffusion Modelscited by 121
  9. 2024Higher Layers Need More LoRA Expertscited by 101
  10. 2019Are All Layers Created Equal?cited by 94
  11. 2025Deep Learning is Not So Mysterious or Differentcited by 55
  12. 2023Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds for Large Language Modelscited by 53
  13. 2023Merging Experts into One: Improving Computational Efficiency of Mixture of Expertscited by 36
  14. 2024AlphaPruning: Using Heavy-Tailed Self Regularization Theory for Improved Layer-wise Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 35
  15. 2024AlphaLoRA: Assigning LoRA Experts Based on Layer Training Qualitycited by 18
  16. 2019The capacity of feedforward neural networkscited by 14
  17. 2025LayerIF: Estimating Layer Quality for Large Language Models using Influence Functionscited by 12
  18. 2025First is Not Really Better Than Last: Evaluating Layer Choice and Aggregation Strategies in Language Model Data Influence Estimationcited by 5
  19. 2024Layer Importance and Hallucination Analysis in Large Language Models via Enhanced Activation Variance-Sparsitycited by 4
  20. 2025Bridging Predictive Coding and MDL: A Two-Part Code Framework for Deep Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.