Segmenting Low-Contrast XCTs of Concrete: An Unsupervised Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
X-Ray Computed Tomography (XCT) is a compelling tool in experimental mechanics, capable of non-destructively extracting information pertaining to the internal morphology of materials. For materials with random heterogeneous morphology such as concrete, such information is of particular relevance since it allows for studies of morphology-related behaviour and for predictive modelling. Nevertheless, XCT images require semantic segmentation for practical usage. Here, concrete poses a unique challenge due to the similar X-ray attenuation coefficients of aggregates and mortar, which result in low contrast between the two phases in the ensuing XCT images. As such, purely intensity-dependent semantic segmentation tools remain unfeasible. While vision transformers (ViTs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are proven techniques for semantic segmentation in such challenging cases, they typically require labelled training data, which is often unavailable for concrete or resource-intensive to obtain, thereby limiting their relevance. To address this challenge, a self-annotation technique is presented here that leverages superpixel algorithms to identify perceptually similar local regions in an image and relates them to the global context by utilizing the receptive field of a CNN-based model. This enables the model to learn a global-local relationship in the images and facilitates the identification of semantically similar structures. When evaluated against manually annotated ground truth on out-of-distribution data, the proposed methodology consistently outperformed direct greyscale thresholding across all pertinent metrics, demonstrating improved discernibility between aggregates and mortar, and providing the most favourable balance of sensitivity and precision for aggregate-phase identification.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 134 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2026.
Builds on
25 of 134 references.
References · 25
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
- 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,784
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
- 2021Per-Pixel Classification is Not All You Need for Semantic Segmentationcited by 1,148
13 more
- 2021ConViT: Improving Vision Transformers with Soft Convolutional Inductive Biasescited by 484
- 2016Efficient Multi-Scale 3D CNN with Fully Connected CRF for Accurate Brain Lesion Segmentationcited by 263
- 2014Efficient Object Localization Using Convolutional Networkscited by 226
- 2020U-Net and its variants for medical image segmentation: theory and applicationscited by 169
- 2020On the Generalization Benefit of Noise in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 81
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Image Segmentation Based on Differentiable Feature Clusteringcited by 61
- 2017W-Net: A Deep Model for Fully Unsupervised Image Segmentationcited by 57
- 2023Unsupervised Universal Image Segmentationcited by 34
- 2022Transforming medical imaging with Transformers? A comparative review of key properties, current progresses, and future perspectivescited by 32
- 2016Deep Learning Markov Random Field for Semantic Segmentationcited by 27
- 2024A comprehensive review and new taxonomy on superpixel segmentationcited by 8
- 2021Semi-Supervised Segmentation of Concrete Aggregate Using Consensus Regularisation and Prior Guidancecited by 2
- 2022ConsInstancy: Learning Instance Representations for Semi-Supervised Panoptic Segmentation of Concrete Aggregate Particlescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.