Automated Quality Check of Sensor Data Annotations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The monitoring of the route and track environment plays an important role in automated driving. For example, it can be used as an assistance system for route monitoring in automation level Grade of Automation (GoA) 2, where the train driver is still on board. In fully automated, driverless driving at automation level GoA4, these systems finally take over environment monitoring completely independently. With the help of artificial intelligence (AI), they react automatically to risks and dangerous events on the route. To train such AI algorithms, large amounts of training data are required, which must meet high-quality standards due to their safety relevance. In this publication we present an automatic method for assuring the quality of training data, significantly reducing the manual workload and accelerating the development of these systems. We propose an open-source tool designed to detect nine common errors found in multi-sensor datasets for railway vehicles. To evaluate the performance of the framework, all detected errors were manually validated. Six issue detection methods achieved 100% precision, while three additional methods reached precision rates 96% and 97%.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2026.
Builds on
4 of 12 references.
References · 4
- 2022Annotation Error Detection: Analyzing the Past and Present for a More Coherent Futurecited by 45
- 2023Analyzing Dataset Annotation Quality Management in the Wildcited by 41
- 2023OSDaR23: Open Sensor Data for Rail 2023cited by 17
- 2023ActiveAED: A Human in the Loop Improves Annotation Error Detectioncited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.