mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Embracing Anisotropy: Turning Massive Activations into Interpretable Control Knobs for Large Language Models

arXiv 2603.00029 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit highly anisotropic internal representations, often characterized by massive activations, a phenomenon where a small subset of feature dimensions possesses magnitudes significantly larger than the rest. While prior works view these extreme dimensions primarily as artifacts to be managed, we propose a distinct perspective: these dimensions serve as intrinsic interpretable functional units arising from domain specialization. Specifically, we propose a simple magnitude-based criterion to identify Domain-Critical Dimensions in a training-free manner. Our analyses reveal that such dimensions behave as interpretable semantic detectors for symbolic/quantitative patterns or domain-specific terms. In addition, we introduce Critical Dimension Steering, which applies activation steering exclusively to the identified dimensions. Empirical results show that this approach outperforms conventional whole-dimension steering in domain adaptation and jailbreaking scenarios.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.

Builds on

24 of 39 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  2. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  3. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
  4. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  5. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  6. 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,307
  7. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
  8. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,009
  9. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
  10. 2022LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scalecited by 881
  11. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
  12. 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
12 more
  1. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
  2. 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
  3. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 733
  4. 2022ZeroQuant: Efficient and Affordable Post-Training Quantization for Large-Scale Transformerscited by 517
  5. 2019Representation Degeneration Problem in Training Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 250
  6. 2024Programming Refusal with Conditional Activation Steeringcited by 191
  7. 2022Outlier Suppression: Pushing the Limit of Low-bit Transformer Language Modelscited by 176
  8. 2021All Bark and No Bite: Rogue Dimensions in Transformer Language Models Obscure Representational Qualitycited by 150
  9. 2021BERT Busters: Outlier Dimensions that Disrupt Transformerscited by 110
  10. 2021Transformer visualization via dictionary learning: contextualized embedding as a linear superposition of transformer factorscited by 106
  11. 2023Exploring Anisotropy and Outliers in Multilingual Language Models for Cross-Lingual Semantic Sentence Similaritycited by 17
  12. 2023Outlier Dimensions Encode Task-Specific Knowledgecited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.