mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Long Range Frequency Tuning for QML

arXiv 2602.23409 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.ETcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Angle-encoded variational quantum circuits admit a truncated Fourier series representation of their output, but approximating functions with maximum frequency ωmax using fixed unary encoding requires O(ωmax) encoding gates. Trainable-frequency (TF) circuits promise a reduction by learning the data-encoding prefactors alongside the ansatz parameters, adapting the accessible frequency spectrum to the target during training. We identify a practical barrier that prevents this promise from being realized: the prefactor gradient is suppressed by the spectral gap between the circuit's accessible frequencies and the target spectrum, independently of the ansatz parameters, confining gradient-driven prefactor movement to a narrow neighborhood of initialization. We propose ternary grid initialization -- setting prefactors to 1, 3, 9, ldots, 3k-1 -- which ensures every target frequency within [-ωmax, ωmax] lies within tfrac12 unit of the accessible spectrum at initialization, so that the spectral-gap bound no longer constrains the target-driven gradient to be small. This is a necessary condition for reliable convergence, whose sufficiency we establish empirically. On a synthetic benchmark with target frequencies shifted well beyond the standard initialization range, ternary initialization achieves median R2 = 0.997 versus 0.18 for unary initialization, with 100% of runs achieving R2 > 0.95 against 0%. CMA-ES with 20× the evaluation budget reaches only 25% success, confirming the limitation is a property of the optimization landscape rather than of gradient-based optimization specifically. Real-world validation on two benchmark datasets demonstrates consistent advantages over both fixed and trainable unary baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2026.

Builds on

10 of 25 references.

References · 10

  1. 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 624
  2. 2016The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorialcited by 364
  3. 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 328
  4. 2023Let Quantum Neural Networks Choose Their Own Frequenciescited by 22
  5. 2022Power and limitations of single-qubit native quantum neural networkscited by 19
  6. 2014A la Carte - Learning Fast Kernelscited by 18
  7. 2025Spectral Bias in Variational Quantum Machine Learningcited by 5
  8. 2024Fourier Analysis of Variational Quantum Circuits for Supervised Learningcited by 4
  9. 2024Spectral invariance and maximality properties of the frequency spectrum of quantum neural networkscited by 3
  10. 2025Mitigating Exponential Mixed Frequency Growth through Frequency Selectioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.