mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Affine-Scaled Attention: Towards Flexible and Stable Transformer Attention

arXiv 2602.23057 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transformer attention is typically implemented using softmax normalization, which enforces attention weights with unit sum normalization. While effective in many settings, this constraint can limit flexibility in controlling attention magnitudes and may contribute to overly concentrated or unstable attention patterns during training. Prior work has explored modifications such as attention sinks or gating mechanisms, but these approaches provide only limited or indirect control over attention reweighting. We propose Affine-Scaled Attention, a simple extension to standard attention that introduces input-dependent scaling and a corresponding bias term applied to softmax-normalized attention weights. This design relaxes the strict normalization constraint while maintaining aggregation of value representations, allowing the model to adjust both the relative distribution and the scale of attention in a controlled manner. We empirically evaluate Affine-Scaled Attention in large-scale language model pretraining across multiple model sizes. Experimental results show consistent improvements in training stability, optimization behavior, and downstream task performance compared to standard softmax attention and attention sink baselines. These findings suggest that modest reweighting of attention outputs provides a practical and effective way to improve attention behavior in Transformer models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2026.

Builds on

21 of 26 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  3. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  4. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  5. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  6. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  7. 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,115
  8. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
  9. 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,024
  10. 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 710
  11. 2025Gated Attention for Large Language Models: Non-linearity, Sparsity, and Attention-Sink-Freecited by 266
  12. 2024When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical Viewcited by 200
9 more
  1. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Applications of Transformers for Deep Learning Taskscited by 70
  2. 2024Bridging the Divide: Reconsidering Softmax and Linear Attentioncited by 48
  3. 2023Approximation Rate of the Transformer Architecture for Sequence Modelingcited by 28
  4. 2025What are you sinking? A geometric approach on attention sinkcited by 26
  5. 2024Understanding the Expressive Power and Mechanisms of Transformer for Sequence Modelingcited by 25
  6. 2024In-Context Learning with Transformers: Softmax Attention Adapts to Function Lipschitznesscited by 22
  7. 2020Normalized Attention Without Probability Cagecited by 19
  8. 2023Why Softmax Attention Outperforms Linear Attentioncited by 15
  9. 2025On the Expressiveness of Softmax Attention: A Recurrent Neural Network Perspectivecited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.