mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Knob: A Physics-Inspired Gating Interface for Interpretable and Controllable Neural Dynamics

arXiv 2602.22702 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing neural network calibration methods often treat calibration as a static, post-hoc optimization task. However, this neglects the dynamic and temporal nature of real-world inference. Moreover, existing methods do not provide an intuitive interface enabling human operators to dynamically adjust model behavior under shifting conditions. In this work, we propose Knob, a framework that connects deep learning with classical control theory by mapping neural gating dynamics to a second-order mechanical system. By establishing correspondences between physical parameters -- damping ratio (zeta) and natural frequency (ωn) -- and neural gating, we create a tunable "safety valve". The core mechanism employs a logit-level convex fusion, functioning as an input-adaptive temperature scaling. It tends to reduce model confidence particularly when model branches produce conflicting predictions. Furthermore, by imposing second-order dynamics (Knob-ODE), we enable a textitdual-mode inference: standard i.i.d. processing for static tasks, and state-preserving processing for continuous streams. Our framework allows operators to tune "stability" and "sensitivity" through familiar physical analogues. This paper presents an exploratory architectural interface; we focus on demonstrating the concept and validating its control-theoretic properties rather than claiming state-of-the-art calibration performance. Experiments on CIFAR-10-C validate the calibration mechanism and demonstrate that, in Continuous Mode, the gate responses are consistent with standard second-order control signatures (step settling and low-pass attenuation), paving the way for predictable human-in-the-loop tuning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2026.

Builds on

13 of 20 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  4. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  5. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  6. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  7. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  8. 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 387
  9. 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 359
  10. 2022Sample-dependent Adaptive Temperature Scaling for Improved Calibrationcited by 48
  11. 2018Attended Temperature Scaling: A Practical Approach for Calibrating Deep Neural Networkscited by 21
  12. 2023RankMixup: Ranking-Based Mixup Training for Network Calibrationcited by 19
1 more
  1. 2025Where are we with calibration under dataset shift in image classification?cited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.