mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Forecasting Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance Trends Using Machine Learning on WHO GLASS Surveillance Data: A Retrieval-Augmented Generation Approach for Policy Decision Support

arXiv 2602.22673 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2026cs.LG q-bio.QMcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health threat. While the WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) provides standardized data, population-level machine learning forecasting of resistance trends remains limited. Translating forecasts into policy also requires transparent interpretation. Methods: Surveillance data (2021-2023) comprising 5,909 observations across 44 countries and five WHO regions were processed. Six models (Naive, Linear, Ridge, XGBoost, LightGBM, LSTM) were benchmarked to forecast one-year-ahead resistance rates using prior-year resistance, antibiotic consumption, and related features. MAE, RMSE, and sMAPE were computed with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals for MAE. A local Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system (Gemma 4) translated forecast findings into policy guidance grounded in WHO documents. Results: XGBoost achieved the best predictive performance (test MAE = 6.13% [95% CI: 5.83-6.44]), an 85.3% error reduction versus the naive baseline (MAE = 41.79%). SHAP analysis identified prior-year resistance as the dominant predictor (50.5% gain). Regional forecast error tracked surveillance coverage, from 3.65% in the European Region to 8.61% in South-East Asia. The RAG pipeline generated source-attributed policy responses without fabricated citations. Conclusion: Short-term AMR resistance rates exhibit strong temporal autocorrelation that can be accurately forecasted using gradient boosting. Coupling these forecasts with a hallucination-resistant RAG system provides a scalable, evidence-based decision-support framework for AMR governance. v3 correction: a leakage audit found feature-construction defects; on the corrected panel a persistence forecast (MAE 5.79) significantly outperforms XGBoost (6.55), and the 85.3% claim is withdrawn (see Correction).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2026.

Builds on

2 of 22 references.

References · 2

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026abx_amr_simulator: A simulation environment for antibiotic prescribing policy optimization under antimicrobial resistance
  2. 2025Optimizing Gene-Based Testing for Antibiotic Resistance Prediction
  3. 2026Screening of Biosecurity Features in Metagenomic Data with Evo 2 Probes
  4. 2025Predicting and generating antibiotics against future pathogens with ApexOracle
  5. 2026Prospective multi-pathogen disease forecasting using autonomous LLM-guided tree search
  6. 2024Machine Learning Models for Dengue Forecasting in Singapore
  7. 2026Understanding Key Features of Time Series Foundation Models from Epidemic Forecasting
  8. 2024Interpreting Microbiome Relative Abundance Data Using Symbolic Regression