Addressing Climate Action Misperceptions with Generative AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mitigating climate change requires behaviour change. However, even climate-concerned individuals often hold misperceptions about which actions most reduce carbon emissions. We recruited 1201 climate-concerned individuals to examine whether discussing climate actions with a large language model (LLM) equipped with climate knowledge and prompted to provide personalised responses would foster more accurate perceptions of the impacts of climate actions and increase willingness to adopt feasible, high-impact behaviours. We compared this to having participants run a web search, have a conversation with an unspecialised LLM, and no intervention. The personalised climate LLM was the only condition that led to increased knowledge about the impacts of climate actions and greater intentions to adopt impactful behaviours. While the personalised climate LLM did not outperform a web search in improving understanding of climate action impacts, the ability of LLMs to deliver personalised, actionable guidance may make them more effective at motivating impactful pro-climate behaviour change.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2026.
Builds on
7 of 40 references.
References · 7
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
- 2023When Large Language Models Meet Personalization: Perspectives of Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 89
- 2025How Hungry is AI? Benchmarking Energy, Water, and Carbon Footprint of LLM Inferencecited by 73
- 2025The Levers of Political Persuasion with Conversational AIcited by 19
- 2025C3AI: Crafting and Evaluating Constitutions for Constitutional AIcited by 13
- 2025AI persuading AI vs AI persuading Humans: LLMs' Differential Effectiveness in Promoting Pro-Environmental Behaviorcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.