mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robust Model Selection for Discovery of Latent Mechanistic Processes

arXiv 2602.22062 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2026stat.ME math.ST stat.THcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When learning interpretable latent structures using model-based approaches, even small deviations from modeling assumptions can lead to inferential results that are not mechanistically meaningful. In this work, we consider latent structures that consist of Ko mechanistic processes, where Ko is unknown. When the model is misspecified, likelihood-based model selection methods can substantially overestimate Ko while more robust nonparametric methods can be overly conservative. Hence, there is a need for approaches that combine the sensitivity of likelihood-based methods with the robustness of nonparametric ones. We formalize this objective in terms of a robust model selection consistency property, which is based on a component-level discrepancy measure that captures the mechanistic structure of the model. We then propose the accumulated cutoff discrepancy criterion (ACDC), which leverages plug-in estimates of component-level discrepancies. To apply ACDC, we develop mechanistically meaningful component-level discrepancies for a general class of latent variable models that includes unsupervised and supervised variants of probabilistic matrix factorization and mixture modeling. We show that ACDC is robustly consistent when applied to unsupervised matrix factorization and mixture models. Numerical results demonstrate that in practice our approach reliably identifies a mechanistically meaningful number of latent processes in numerous illustrative applications, outperforming existing methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.