Automatic Map Density Selection for Locally-Performant Visual Place Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A key challenge in translating Visual Place Recognition (VPR) from the lab to long-term deployment is ensuring a priori that a system can meet user-specified performance requirements across different parts of an environment, rather than just on average globally. One critical mechanism for controlling this local performance is the density of the reference mapping database, yet this factor is largely neglected in existing work, where fixed, engineering-driven sampling densities based on sensors, storage, or GPS frequency are typically used. In this paper, we propose a VPR mapping approach that uses two reference traverses from the operating environment to automatically select an appropriate map density satisfying two user-defined requirements: (1) a target Local Recall@1 level, and (2) the proportion of the operational environment over which it must be met or exceeded, which we term the Recall Achievement Rate (RAR). Our approach uses spatial consistency and coherence features from reference-to-reference matches at multiple map densities to estimate the density needed to meet these targets on unseen deployment data. Through experiments across two VPR methods and the Nordland and Oxford RobotCar benchmarks, we show that our system consistently meets or exceeds the target Local Recall@1 over at least the user-specified proportion of the environment. Comparisons with alternative baselines show that it reliably selects an appropriate operating point in map density, avoiding unnecessarily dense maps. Finally, ablations evaluate sensitivity to reference traversal choice and segment length, and our analysis reveals that conventional global Recall@1 is a poor predictor of the often more operationally meaningful RAR metric.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2026.
Builds on
22 of 39 references.
References · 22
- 2015NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognitioncited by 941
- 2017Fine-tuning CNN Image Retrieval with No Human Annotationcited by 499
- 2021Patch-NetVLAD: Multi-Scale Fusion of Locally-Global Descriptors for Place Recognitioncited by 238
- 2019Learning with Average Precision: Training Image Retrieval with a Listwise Losscited by 185
- 2022Rethinking Visual Geo-localization for Large-Scale Applicationscited by 163
- 2023AnyLoc: Towards Universal Visual Place Recognitioncited by 163
- 2023MixVPR: Feature Mixing for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 161
- 2023Optimal Transport Aggregation for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 152
- 2023EigenPlaces: Training Viewpoint Robust Models for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 111
- 2022GSV-Cities: Toward Appropriate Supervised Visual Place Recognitioncited by 93
- 2021Where is your place, Visual Place Recognition?cited by 82
- 2024BoQ: A Place is Worth a Bag of Learnable Queriescited by 64
10 more
- 2024CricaVPR: Cross-image Correlation-aware Representation Learning for Visual Place Recognitioncited by 61
- 2025MegaLoc: One Retrieval to Place Them Allcited by 60
- 2023Data-efficient Large Scale Place Recognition with Graded Similarity Supervisioncited by 43
- 2021Direct LiDAR Odometry: Fast Localization with Dense Point Cloudscited by 30
- 2020Intelligent Reference Curation for Visual Place Recognition via Bayesian Selective Fusioncited by 18
- 2021Spiking Neural Networks for Visual Place Recognition via Weighted Neuronal Assignmentscited by 15
- 2019MRS-VPR: a multi-resolution sampling based global visual place recognition methodcited by 9
- 2024Submodular Optimization for Keyframe Selection & Usage in SLAMcited by 4
- 2025A Minimal Subset Approach for Informed Keyframe Sampling in Large-Scale SLAMcited by 2
- 2024A Hyperdimensional One Place Signature to Represent Them All: Stackable Descriptors For Visual Place Recognitioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.